IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jfr/ijhe11/v5y2016i3p201.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Student Perceptions to Teaching Undergraduate Anatomy in Health Sciences

Author

Listed:
  • Ryan S Anderton
  • Li Shan Chiu
  • Susan Aulfrey

Abstract

Anatomy and physiology teaching has undergone significant changes to keep up with advances in technology and to cater for a wide array of student specific learning approaches. This paper examines perceptions towards a variety of teaching instruments, techniques, and innovations used in the delivery and teaching of anatomy and physiology for health science students, and asks whether active learning through more progressive methods of teaching is beneficial for students across health science disciplines. In total, 138 health science students consisting of 32 biomedical science students, 52 exercise and sports science students, and 54 health and physical education students completed the retrospective study. Biomedical science students were least receptive to progressive teaching modalities, preferring anatomical dissections to laboratory workbooks (p <0.05) and body painting (p <0.05). In comparison, students from health and sport related degrees responded significantly better to anatomical models and laboratory workbooks than anatomical dissections (p <0.001). While gender differences were subtle, males responded positively to online multiple-choice question resources (p < 0.05) in comparison to females. Following a multimodal delivery of anatomy and physiology, students from all cohorts reported feeling significantly more confident (p < 0.005) when discussing all material in the course. The results obtained demonstrate differences amongst cohorts, which indicate that student perceptions to learning anatomy and physiology are dependent on individual course expectations. Moreover, these results support “hands on†practical teaching, and the use of a variety of teaching tools to foster learning and enjoyment of anatomy and physiology in health sciences.

Suggested Citation

  • Ryan S Anderton & Li Shan Chiu & Susan Aulfrey, 2016. "Student Perceptions to Teaching Undergraduate Anatomy in Health Sciences," International Journal of Higher Education, Sciedu Press, vol. 5(3), pages 201-201, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:jfr:ijhe11:v:5:y:2016:i:3:p:201
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/ijhe/article/download/9831/6124
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/ijhe/article/view/9831
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ryan S Anderton & Tess Evans & Paola T Chivers, 2016. "Predicting Academic Success of Health Science Students for First Year Anatomy and Physiology," International Journal of Higher Education, Sciedu Press, vol. 5(1), pages 250-250, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Conner Blackmore & Kathryn Hird & Ryan S Anderton, 2021. "An Investigation of Secondary School STEM Subjects as Predictors of Academic Performance in Tertiary Level Health Sciences Programs," International Journal of Higher Education, Sciedu Press, vol. 10(1), pages 1-76, February.
    2. Julian Vitali & Conner Blackmore & Siavash Mortazavi & Ryan Anderton, 2020. "Tertiary Anatomy and Physiology, A Barrier for Student Success," International Journal of Higher Education, Sciedu Press, vol. 9(2), pages 289-289, April.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jfr:ijhe11:v:5:y:2016:i:3:p:201. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sciedu Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.