IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jfr/ijhe11/v4y2015i1p232.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparison of a Traditional Lecture-based and Online Supplemental Video and Lecture-Based Approach in an Engineering Statics Class

Author

Listed:
  • Colleen M. Halupa
  • Benjamin W. Caldwell

Abstract

This quasi-experimental research study evaluated two intact undergraduate engineering statics classes at a private university in Texas. Students in the control group received traditional lecture, readings and homework assignments. Those in the experimental group also were given access to a complete set of online video lectures and videos demonstrating how each type of mathematical problem was solved through the learning management system. Overall, students in the experimental group perceived course material more positively than those in the control group and felt the additional material was useful. The experimental group had slightly improved cumulative test scores, but these differences were not statistically significant.Â

Suggested Citation

  • Colleen M. Halupa & Benjamin W. Caldwell, 2015. "A Comparison of a Traditional Lecture-based and Online Supplemental Video and Lecture-Based Approach in an Engineering Statics Class," International Journal of Higher Education, Sciedu Press, vol. 4(1), pages 232-232, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:jfr:ijhe11:v:4:y:2015:i:1:p:232
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/ijhe/article/download/6438/3888
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/ijhe/article/view/6438
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jfr:ijhe11:v:4:y:2015:i:1:p:232. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sciedu Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.