IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jfr/ijhe11/v2y2013i4p42.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Campus and Online U.S. College Students’ Attitudes Toward an Open Educational Resource Course Fee: A Pilot Study

Author

Listed:
  • Brian Lindshield
  • Koushik Adhikari

Abstract

Convincing faculty to accept, create, adapt, and adopt open educational resources (OERs) instead of textbooks for their courses has proven challenging because incentives are lacking. One approach to provide incentive to faculty members is an OER course fee, which could be employed in courses that use OERs approved by the institution for courses that do not utilize textbooks or other resources students must purchase. This fee would provide sustained incentive for using OERs while also decreasing student expense compared with what most currently pay for textbooks. We set out to determine if campus and online students who had used a free OER textbook replacement would support the idea, and implementation at their institution, of an OER course fee. Among online students (n = 17), those who supported an OER course fee at their institution (n = 6) the mean appropriate course fee amount was $9.58/credit hour. Subsequent campus (n = 46) and online students (n = 57) were asked whether they supported a $10/credit hour OER course fee, greater than 67% of somewhat agreed, agreed, or strongly agreed. While these pilot results are encouraging, it is important to note that they are from one course, using one OER, by one instructor at one institution. More research is needed to determine if there is similar support for OER course fees in a broader base of students. If so, OER course fees may be a legitimate approach to increase the acceptance, creation, adaptation, and adoption of OER.

Suggested Citation

  • Brian Lindshield & Koushik Adhikari, 2013. "Campus and Online U.S. College Students’ Attitudes Toward an Open Educational Resource Course Fee: A Pilot Study," International Journal of Higher Education, Sciedu Press, vol. 2(4), pages 1-42, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:jfr:ijhe11:v:2:y:2013:i:4:p:42
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/ijhe/article/download/3312/2003
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/ijhe/article/view/3312
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jfr:ijhe11:v:2:y:2013:i:4:p:42. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sciedu Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.