IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jfr/ijhe11/v14y2025i6p74.html

Harnessing Generative Artificial Intelligence to Advance Education for Sustainable Development

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Toro-Troconis
  • Romas Malevicius
  • Catrin Darsley
  • Theresa Nicholson
  • Vicki Dale
  • Nathalie Tasler
  • Elizabeth Price

Abstract

In this paper we report on a study of the impact of the CoDesignS ESD AI Coach on academic and practitioner perspectives regarding the integration of Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) within teaching and curriculum design. Employing activity theory as the analytical framework, we investigate both the opportunities and limitations associated with the use of generative AI (GenAI) in educational contexts to support ESD.Eighteen participants from a range of higher education (HE) institutions in the UK engaged in the research through a workshop setting. The cohort represented a breadth of disciplinary backgrounds, including engineering, medical sciences, sustainability and veterinary sciences.The workshop introduced participants to concepts of sustainability and ESD, followed by the CoDesignS ESD Framework and its Role, Objective, Community, Key, Shape (ROCKS) method for effective prompting.We employed a mixed-methods research design, incorporating pre-and-post surveys alongside focus groups. Discussion focused on the extent to which the tool enhanced or hindered participants’ understanding of sustainability concepts, and how well it aligned with disciplinary expectations. Reflections also addressed the perceived relevance and accuracy of GenAI-generated content.Survey data revealed that participants felt more confident and better equipped with resources to embed sustainability into their curriculum, and they reported increased assurance in using GenAI tools for curriculum development.Based on focus group analysis, we conclude that the CoDesignS ESD AI Coach holds particular value as a prompt for idea generation. However, it should not be used in isolation. Those specialising in sustainability and curriculum design should guide its effective implementation.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Toro-Troconis & Romas Malevicius & Catrin Darsley & Theresa Nicholson & Vicki Dale & Nathalie Tasler & Elizabeth Price, 2025. "Harnessing Generative Artificial Intelligence to Advance Education for Sustainable Development," International Journal of Higher Education, Sciedu Press, vol. 14(6), pages 1-74, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:jfr:ijhe11:v:14:y:2025:i:6:p:74
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/ijhe/article/download/28731/17456
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/ijhe/article/view/28731
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sdenka Zobeida Salas-Pilco & Kejiang Xiao & Jun Oshima, 2022. "Artificial Intelligence and New Technologies in Inclusive Education for Minority Students: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-17, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zehui Zhan & Shijing Niu, 2023. "Subject integration and theme evolution of STEM education in K-12 and higher education research," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-13, December.
    2. Ying Yang & Jinruo Qin & Jing Lei & Yanping Liu, 2023. "Research Status and Challenges on the Sustainable Development of Artificial Intelligence Courses from a Global Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-20, June.
    3. André Alexus Lewis, 2025. "Unpacking Cultural Bias in AI Language Learning Tools: An Analysis of Impacts and Strategies for Inclusion in Diverse Educational Settings," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(1), pages 1878-1892, January.
    4. repec:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:i:14:p:2998-3010 is not listed on IDEAS

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jfr:ijhe11:v:14:y:2025:i:6:p:74. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sciedu Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.