IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jfr/ijhe11/v10y2021i4p105.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Self-Perception of Universal Design for Learning in Young People Studying in Professional Education Science Programs

Author

Listed:
  • Rodrigo Monne de la Peña
  • Ruben Vidal-Espinoza
  • Marco Cossio-Bolaños
  • Camilo Urra-Albornoz
  • Carolina Cornejo-Valderrama
  • Yesenia Quitral Poblete
  • Romina Sepúlveda Romero
  • Vivianne Torres Olave
  • Rossana Gomez-Campos

Abstract

Learning involves an important challenge, in which unnecessary barriers must be eliminated, without eliminating the necessary challenges. In that sense, it is universal learning design (UDL) that encourages the creation of flexible designs that provide effective instruction to all learners. This descriptive study compares the self-perception of the UDL among young university students studying in professional programs in the area of educational sciences at a private university according to the professional program, gender and training received. Participated 271 university students in professional programs in the area of Educational Sciences, whose age range was between 20 and 30 years old. The professional programs of Physical Education, English, Science, Mathematics, Special Education, Basic Pedagogy, Language and Preschool Education were included. Self-perception of Universal Design for Learning (UDL) was measured through the Survey technique, using as an instrument the questionnaire proposed by Sánchez-Fuentes, Castro Durán, Casas Bolaños, & Vallejos Garcías (2016), which has 25 questions and includes the three principles of the UDL. The results showed that the students in the preschool program reflected higher average values than their counterparts in other professional programs (83.6±12.2 points), followed by special education (60.4±9.8 points) and language (60.8±6.6 points) (p<0.05). Female students reflected higher self-perception (59.3±8.9 points) than male students (51.8±11.4 points). Students who have received training in UDL have higher average values (61.75±11.63 points) in relation to those who did not receive training (57.65±12.52 points) (p<0.05). Students in the preschool education program, as well as those who received training and women in general, have reflected a better self-perception in UDL in relation to their counterparts. These results suggest the implementation of programs and educational resources to improve the perception of UDL, especially among men.

Suggested Citation

  • Rodrigo Monne de la Peña & Ruben Vidal-Espinoza & Marco Cossio-Bolaños & Camilo Urra-Albornoz & Carolina Cornejo-Valderrama & Yesenia Quitral Poblete & Romina Sepúlveda Romero & Vivianne Torres Ola, 2021. "Self-Perception of Universal Design for Learning in Young People Studying in Professional Education Science Programs," International Journal of Higher Education, Sciedu Press, vol. 10(4), pages 105-105, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:jfr:ijhe11:v:10:y:2021:i:4:p:105
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/ijhe/article/download/19907/12364
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/ijhe/article/view/19907
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jfr:ijhe11:v:10:y:2021:i:4:p:105. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sciedu Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.