IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jfr/ijhe11/v10y2021i3p246.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“Should I Stay or Should I Go?†Indicators of Dropping Out Thoughts of Doctoral Students in Computer Science

Author

Listed:
  • Dorothee Alfermann
  • Christopher Holl
  • Swantje Reimann

Abstract

Evidence in the literature indicates that doctoral candidates may experience increased levels of stress and worry about successfully completing their doctorate degrees. As a result, a significant number of doctoral candidates drop out. In our study with 424 doctoral students in computer science (113 women, 311 men), we ask about the frequency of dropout thoughts as an indicator of possible premature termination. By means of machine learning algorithms, we extract variables associated with higher or lower likelihood of dropout thoughts. In particular, satisfaction with advisor’s support, experiencing a crisis, professional self-efficacy, choice of advisor, and perceived meaningfulness of additional work tasks proved to be of central importance. Based on these results, we suggest taking steps to improve professional and social support for doctoral students. Recommendations include implementing more intensive supervision in the early stages of the doctorate, improve the match between doctoral candidates’ expectations and the requirements of the respective institute, monitor progress during the doctorate (e.g., with the help of an advisor agreement), and increase the qualifications of advisors to include leadership and communication skills.

Suggested Citation

  • Dorothee Alfermann & Christopher Holl & Swantje Reimann, 2021. "“Should I Stay or Should I Go?†Indicators of Dropping Out Thoughts of Doctoral Students in Computer Science," International Journal of Higher Education, Sciedu Press, vol. 10(3), pages 246-246, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:jfr:ijhe11:v:10:y:2021:i:3:p:246
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/ijhe/article/download/19871/12352
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/ijhe/article/view/19871
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Karra Harrington, 2018. "Harness the power of groups to beat the ‘PhD blues’," Nature, Nature, vol. 559(7712), pages 143-144, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      JEL classification:

      • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
      • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jfr:ijhe11:v:10:y:2021:i:3:p:246. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sciedu Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.