IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jfr/elr111/v15y2026i1p34.html

A Comparative Study on the Translation Quality of Eco-cultural Terms in Tourism Texts of Qinghai Province: An Empirical Analysis Based on Large Language Models

Author

Listed:
  • Chunli Yu
  • Hongyan Tuo

Abstract

This study conducts an empirical comparative analysis of translations generated by four mainstream large language models (ChatGPT, Google Gemini, DeepSeek, and Qwen) for 300 Qinghai ecotourism-related eco-cultural terms across four categories (Natural Landscapes, Ecological Resources & Conservation, Tourism Activities & Facilities, and Culture & Folk Customs). A multi-dimensional evaluation system covering accuracy, cultural connotation retention, terminological consistency, and readability is employed to assess each model's performance. The results show that Google Gemini achieves the highest overall performance, excelling particularly in accuracy for natural landscape and ecological resource terms, and demonstrating strong capabilities in cultural connotation retention and readability. Qwen ranks second, with notable strength in cultural connotation retention and balanced performance across other dimensions. DeepSeek follows, maintaining stable and consistent output with good terminological uniformity. ChatGPT offers acceptable readability and natural expression. Based on these findings, the study proposes targeted optimization strategies and constructs a reference translation corpus, aiming to support the international dissemination of Qinghai's ecotourism culture and to enrich empirical research on LLM-based translation in regional ecotourism contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Chunli Yu & Hongyan Tuo, 2026. "A Comparative Study on the Translation Quality of Eco-cultural Terms in Tourism Texts of Qinghai Province: An Empirical Analysis Based on Large Language Models," English Linguistics Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 15(1), pages 1-34, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:jfr:elr111:v:15:y:2026:i:1:p:34
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/elr/article/download/30032/17852
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/elr/article/view/30032
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jfr:elr111:v:15:y:2026:i:1:p:34. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sciedu Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://elr.sciedupress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.