IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jfr/elr111/v10y2021i4p49-61.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Teachers’ Perception of Advantages and Disadvantages of Kahoot!

Author

Listed:
  • Abouzar Rajabpour

Abstract

Many instructors around the world have been using different Game-based Student Response Systems due to the rise in the variety and availability of digital educational and commercial games. Kahoot, one of the most popular among these systems, provides a game experience by combining theory of intrinsic motivation and game-flow with the help of audio/visual aids. In spite of the numerous attempts to evaluate this game-based tool according, limited research has focused on teachers’ perceptions of the potential strengths and weaknesses of Kahoot, specifically in GCC countries. Employing focus group interviews, this study attempts to shed some light on the potential advantages and disadvantages of Kahoot by gathering the views of teachers who work at the Center for Preparatory Studies at a university in Oman. Results indicate that although teachers believe that Kahoot is qualified with several positive features, it still suffers from several disadvantages in which it can definitely improve.

Suggested Citation

  • Abouzar Rajabpour, 2021. "Teachers’ Perception of Advantages and Disadvantages of Kahoot!," English Linguistics Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 10(4), pages 49-61, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:jfr:elr111:v:10:y:2021:i:4:p:49-61
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/elr/article/download/21222/13100
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/elr/article/view/21222
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jfr:elr111:v:10:y:2021:i:4:p:49-61. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sciedu Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://elr.sciedupress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.