IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jfr/elr111/v10y2021i2p33-37.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Hill of Love Is Different From the Hill of Marriage: Re-Reading Mariama Ba’s Scarlet Song

Author

Listed:
  • Angela Ngozi Dick

Abstract

The task of this paper is to discover the wisdom behind this Wolof proverb- “When one abandons one’s own hill, the next hill which one climbs will crumble†. This paper has shown that the hill is the environment, race, cultural precepts, maternal bond, and values of the characters themselves that inhibit intercultural marriage. The theoretical framework used in this article is mainly deconstructionist theory, nonetheless eclectic approach is accommodated because of the interpretation of the concept hill. The interpretations of what constitutes a hill affected some characters negatively so that they did not achieve their goals fully. Other characters did not allow cultural pull and family ties to overwhelm them. Cultural precepts like the formidable power wielded by mother in-laws, maternal bond, mother’s culinary art, polygamy overwhelmed the protagonist to insanity. This paper recommends that mothers in-law should relax their maternal hold on their sons when they are married. The men who are not emotionally strong to withstand cultural pull should marry their own kinswomen.

Suggested Citation

  • Angela Ngozi Dick, 2021. "The Hill of Love Is Different From the Hill of Marriage: Re-Reading Mariama Ba’s Scarlet Song," English Linguistics Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 10(2), pages 33-37, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:jfr:elr111:v:10:y:2021:i:2:p:33-37
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/elr/article/download/20538/12636
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/elr/article/view/20538
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jfr:elr111:v:10:y:2021:i:2:p:33-37. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sciedu Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://elr.sciedupress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.