IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jfr/bmr111/v4y2015i1p34-43.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Difficulties Experienced during Implementation of an Adapted Quality Management System in Incubated Companies

Author

Listed:
  • Rosley Anholon
  • Eugenio Jose Zoqui
  • Jefferson de Souza Pinto
  • Olivio Novaski

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is presents a study to find out the main difficulties experienced by nine micro and small enterprises throughout the implementation of a quality management system adapted to the reality of companies incubated. According to the objective presented, the article used the case study technique applied in nine incubated company, emphasizing the difficulties observed during the implementation of quality management system adapted to their realities. After the implementation, those companies showed significant progress in their management models. However we observed some gaps to conquer better results, such as difficulties in establishing long-term goals; non-financial targets; the idea that employees can¡¯t help in the improvement company, among other difficulties reported in this paper. In the literature there are a lot of papers about quality management in micro and small enterprises, but this work stands out for analyze a specific kind of company, micro and small companies incubated. This is the main difference and value.

Suggested Citation

  • Rosley Anholon & Eugenio Jose Zoqui & Jefferson de Souza Pinto & Olivio Novaski, 2015. "Difficulties Experienced during Implementation of an Adapted Quality Management System in Incubated Companies," Business and Management Research, Business and Management Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 4(1), pages 34-43, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:jfr:bmr111:v:4:y:2015:i:1:p:34-43
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/bmr/article/download/6258/4009
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/bmr/article/view/6258
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jfr:bmr111:v:4:y:2015:i:1:p:34-43. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Simon Lee (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://bmr.sciedupress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.