IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jfr/bmr111/v12y2023i1p48-65.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cost-Efficiency Evaluation into the European Union Budget

Author

Listed:
  • Antonio Sanchez-Bayon
  • Fco. Javier Sastre Segovia
  • Ricardo Altimira Vega

Abstract

This review is a qualitative study, according to the heterodox approaches, assessed the leading beneficient State under the European Union budget system. For this purpose, the study utilized the Multiannual Financial Framework reports between 2014-2020, which dealt with more than 700 indicators, measuring success against more than 60 general objectives, and more than 220 specific objectives in the performance framework. Therefore, trade globalization, political economy, economic history, social contribution by the European Union budget, and international economics under new-institutional economics have been evaluated in this process. Assessment outcomes found that poorer Member States are the net beneficient regarding the European Union budget’s net balance and financial corrections. However, Germany is the leading beneficient of the European Union budget system as it has extended trade to all along the border of the European Union without tariffs and has become a more cost-effective economy against the outside economies (like the United States of America or China) of the European Union territory. Thus, the current study suggested that nations under the European Union budget system should invest more in sustainable production to get real-time benefit from the European Union integration.

Suggested Citation

  • Antonio Sanchez-Bayon & Fco. Javier Sastre Segovia & Ricardo Altimira Vega, 2023. "Cost-Efficiency Evaluation into the European Union Budget," Business and Management Research, Business and Management Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 12(1), pages 48-65, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:jfr:bmr111:v:12:y:2023:i:1:p:48-65
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/bmr/article/download/24224/15057
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/bmr/article/view/24224
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jfr:bmr111:v:12:y:2023:i:1:p:48-65. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Simon Lee (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://bmr.sciedupress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.