IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jfr/afr111/v2y2013i3p53.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

VIX Futures ETNs: Three Dimensional Losers

Author

Listed:
  • G.D. Hancock

Abstract

This research tests the performance of volatility Exchange Traded Notes (ETN) and Funds and compares the results to three benchmarks to determine whether the risk-adjusted returns are sufficient to compensate for the high risk and high expenses. Two tests are composed along three dimensions to establish the magnitude and frequency with which the volatility funds outperform the benchmarks. The first dimension tests the robustness of the fund performance to the construction of the portfolio. The results provide evidence that the strong negative correlation between the S&P 500 and ETN returns is not sufficient to consistently produce risk-adjusted returns greater than the benchmarks. The second dimension tests the sensitivity of the results to one-day, one-week and one-month holding periods. The findings indicate that changes in the holding period alter the identity of the successful portfolios but the number of successful funds remains low regardless of the holding period. Finally, the third dimension employs two different weighting methods to the construction of the portfolios. Once again, the findings show that the number of successful portfolios produced by either weighting method is low and unimpressive relative to the benchmarks. Overall, the evidence suggests that the poor performance is unique to volatility ETNs rather than to volatility in general.

Suggested Citation

  • G.D. Hancock, 2013. "VIX Futures ETNs: Three Dimensional Losers," Accounting and Finance Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 2(3), pages 1-53, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:jfr:afr111:v:2:y:2013:i:3:p:53
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/afr/article/download/2984/1770
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/afr/article/view/2984
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jfr:afr111:v:2:y:2013:i:3:p:53. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sciedu Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.