IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jes/eurint/y2018v5p213-227.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Universal Basic Income As A Potential Innovative Tool For Reforming The Social Dimension Of The European Union. Pros And Cons

Author

Listed:
  • Georgeta GHEBREA

    (University of Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

Twenty years after Nice Social Summit, the European Union organised in 2017 another Social Summit in Gothenburg, looking for new strategies to combat inequality, poverty and social exclusion. One of these new solutions debated in Gothenburg was the Universal Basic Income (UBI). Our main goal is to find out how appropriate is UBI for reforming the European social policies. Our methodology contains assessments of theoretical and empirical experiments, as well as document analyses. Our results show that UBI is not a univocal concept and its evaluation depends on different ideological standpoints. Also, UBI outcomes are contingent upon the social context. Therefore, despite its undeniable potential improvements, UBI does not seem appropriate to the European context: it would not have a significant impact on poverty and inequality but it would have very high costs. Also, since Europeans benefit from comprehensive welfare systems, UBI would not increase the progressivity of social protection.

Suggested Citation

  • Georgeta GHEBREA, 2018. "The Universal Basic Income As A Potential Innovative Tool For Reforming The Social Dimension Of The European Union. Pros And Cons," EURINT, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 5, pages 213-227.
    • Handle: RePEc:jes:eurint:y:2018:v:5:p:213-227
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://cse.uaic.ro/eurint/proceedings/index_htm_files/EURINT2018_GHE.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Samuel Brittan, 1995. "Capitalism with a Human Face," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 62.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Werner De Bondt, 2010. "The crisis of 2008 and financial reform," Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 2(3), pages 137-156, October.
    2. Paulsen Roland, 2008. "Economically Forced to Work: A Critical Reconsideration of the Lottery Question," Basic Income Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 3(2), pages 1-20, November.
    3. Frolov, Daniil & Shulimova, Anna, 2014. "The Institutionalization of Socio-Responsible Business: Global Trends and Regional Features," MPRA Paper 54963, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Hugh Ward & Albert Weale, 2010. "Is Rule by Majorities Special?," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 58(1), pages 26-46, February.
    5. L W C Lai, 1999. "Hayek and Town Planning: A Note on Hayek's Views towards Town Planning in The Constitution of Liberty," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 31(9), pages 1567-1582, September.
    6. ., 2014. "Islamic economics: what it is and how it developed," Chapters, in: Morality and Justice in Islamic Economics and Finance, chapter 2, pages 41-66, Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jes:eurint:y:2018:v:5:p:213-227. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alupului Ciprian (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/csjesro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.