IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jes/eurint/y2018v5p146-161.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Features Of The Establishment Of Decentralization Processes In Ukraine With The Support Of Eu Founds And International Technical Assistance Programs

Author

Listed:
  • Sergii BOSTAN

    (Yuriy Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University, Ukraine)

Abstract

Decentralization is one of the most important reforms for many countries in the world over the past two decades. The decentralization process in Ukraine envisages a comprehensive reform of the administrative-territorial system, as well as the educational and medical spheres. Introduction of changes in the system of public administration and territorial organization of power, strengthening the role of local self-government and enhancement of community capacity are important steps towards modernization of the country. The present paper seeks to answer how the decentralization reform contributes to establishment of a new system of social relations in Ukraine considering foreign practices and experience. The paper argues that the new system of territorial organization in Ukraine increases the level of development of the amalgamated hromadas and enhances their capacity. The efficiency of decentralization process in Ukraine is closely related to cooperation between public authorities, international donors and civil society institutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Sergii BOSTAN, 2018. "Features Of The Establishment Of Decentralization Processes In Ukraine With The Support Of Eu Founds And International Technical Assistance Programs," EURINT, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 5, pages 146-161.
    • Handle: RePEc:jes:eurint:y:2018:v:5:p:146-161
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://cse.uaic.ro/eurint/proceedings/index_htm_files/EURINT2018_BOS.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Patrick Heller, 2001. "Moving the State: The Politics of Democratic Decentralization in Kerala, South Africa, and Porto Alegre," Politics & Society, , vol. 29(1), pages 131-163, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Caroline Patsias & Anne Latendresse & Laurence Bherer, 2013. "Participatory Democracy, Decentralization and Local Governance: the Montreal Participatory Budget in the light of ‘Empowered Participatory Governance’," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(6), pages 2214-2230, November.
    2. Jafar, K, 2014. "A Note on Peoples’ Planning Initiative -Possible lessons from the Kerala Experience," MPRA Paper 65610, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Grillos, Tara, 2017. "Participatory Budgeting and the Poor: Tracing Bias in a Multi-Staged Process in Solo, Indonesia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 343-358.
    4. Meenal Shrivastava, 2008. "South Africa in the Contemporary International Economy," South Asian Survey, , vol. 15(1), pages 121-142, January.
    5. Nath, Sanchayan & Shams, Jahin & van Laerhoven, Frank & Driessen, Peter, 2022. "The impact of decision-making on conflict: Rethinking the roles of technocrats and residents during Tidal River Management in coastal Bangladesh," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    6. Louise Tillin, 2013. "National and Subnational Comparative Politics: Why, What and How," Studies in Indian Politics, , vol. 1(2), pages 235-240, December.
    7. Esther Hernández‐Medina, 2010. "Social Inclusion through Participation: the Case of the Participatory Budget in São Paulo," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(3), pages 512-532, September.
    8. Miguel Niño-Zarazúa & Armando Barrientos & David Hulme & Sam Hickey, 2010. "Social protection in sub-Saharan Africa: Will the green shoots blossom?," Global Development Institute Working Paper Series 11610, GDI, The University of Manchester.
    9. Palash Kamruzzaman, 2020. "Exploring the Nexus Between Participation and Empowerment," Journal of Development Policy and Practice, , vol. 5(1), pages 32-53, January.
    10. Paniagua, Victoria, 2022. "When clients vote for brokers: How elections improve public goods provision in urban slums," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    11. Platteau, Jean-Philippe & Gaspart, Frederic, 2003. "The Risk of Resource Misappropriation in Community-Driven Development," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 31(10), pages 1687-1703, October.
    12. Apaydin, Fulya, 2012. "Partisan Preferences and Skill Formation Policies: New Evidence from Turkey and Argentina," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 40(8), pages 1522-1533.
    13. Alex Aylett, 2010. "Participatory Planning, Justice, and Climate Change in Durban, South Africa," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 42(1), pages 99-115, January.
    14. Binitha V. Thampi & Aarti Kawlra, 2019. "An Experiment in Feminist Technology in Local Governance: Revisiting the Question of ‘Invited Spaces’ of Participation in Kerala," Review of Development and Change, , vol. 24(2), pages 205-223, December.
    15. Alex Aylett, 2010. "Conflict, Collaboration and Climate Change: Participatory Democracy and Urban Environmental Struggles in Durban, South Africa," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(3), pages 478-495, September.
    16. Matthias vom Hau, 2012. "State capacity and inclusive development: new challenges and directions," Global Development Institute Working Paper Series esid-002-12, GDI, The University of Manchester.
    17. Glyn Williams & J Devika & Guro Aandahl, 2015. "Making space for women in urban governance? Leadership and claims-making in a Kerala slum," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 47(5), pages 1113-1131, May.
    18. Ganesh Prasad Pandeya & Shree Krishna Shrestha, 2016. "Does Citizen Participation Improve Local Planning? An Empirical Analysis of Stakeholders’ Perceptions in Nepal," Journal of South Asian Development, , vol. 11(3), pages 276-304, December.
    19. Sharma, Chanchal Kumar, 2014. "Governance,Governmentality and Governability: Constraints and Possibilities of Decentralization in South Asia," MPRA Paper 61349, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 15 Jan 2015.
    20. Alex Aylett, 2013. "Networked Urban Climate Governance: Neighborhood-Scale Residential Solar Energy Systems and the Example of Solarize Portland," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 31(5), pages 858-875, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jes:eurint:y:2018:v:5:p:146-161. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alupului Ciprian (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/csjesro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.