IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Evaluation Of David Ricardo¡¯S Theory Of Comparative Costs: Direct And Indirect Critiques


  • Oumar Bouare

    () (AEM)


Following Smith¡¯s advocacy of free trade and competition, David Ricardo attempts to strengthen his theory of absolute advantage, which excludes from international trade countries which have no advantages over others, by eliminating this weakness. To do so, Ricardo introduces to the economics literature a theory of comparative cost advantage which includes countries that do not have absolute advantages in international trade. In Ricardo¡¯s framework, these countries can still gain from free trade. We present direct and indirect critiques which reveal that their advocacy of free trade is questionable. In our direct critiques we find that Ricardo¡¯s attempt is questionable for the following reasons. First, the scale of production of cloth in Portugal and that of wine in England equal 1 even though there is no reason to believe that two countries have the same scale of production for two different commodities. Second, it is argued that his theory is incomplete because it is based on particular numbers, does not determine the terms of trade, and does not take into account the unintended curtailment of demand in both countries, which in turn can make trade non-beneficial for both countries. In our indirect critiques, first we argue that Ricardo assumes the equality between the relative price and relative labor cost of two commodities even though they are different. Second, it is shown that the outcome of complete specialization in his theory prevents a country from specializing in the production of a commodity that could generate for itself a substantial profit in the long run, locking the country out of industrialization. We then point out that Samuelson who supports Ricardo¡¯s theory to some extent does not consider in his proof the possible destruction of the domestic industry in the case of free trade, even though this might make domestic consumers worse off and also lock a country out of industrialization.

Suggested Citation

  • Oumar Bouare, 2009. "An Evaluation Of David Ricardo¡¯S Theory Of Comparative Costs: Direct And Indirect Critiques," Journal of Economic Development, Chung-Ang Unviersity, Department of Economics, vol. 34(1), pages 99-125, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:jed:journl:v:34:y:2009:i:1:p:99-125

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Mill, John Stuart, 1874. "Essays on Some Unsettled Questions of Political Economy," History of Economic Thought Books, McMaster University Archive for the History of Economic Thought, edition 2, number mill1874.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)


    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.

    Cited by:

    1. Jorge Morales Meoqui, 2017. "Ricardo's Numerical Example Versus Ricardian Trade Model: a Comparison of Two Distinct Notions of Comparative Advantage," Economic Thought, World Economics Association, vol. 6(1), pages 35-55, March.

    More about this item


    Comparative Costs; Complete Specialization; Scale of Production; Relative Price and Labor Cost; Gain from Free Trade; Lock out of Industrialization;

    JEL classification:

    • B12 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought through 1925 - - - Classical (includes Adam Smith)
    • F1 - International Economics - - Trade


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jed:journl:v:34:y:2009:i:1:p:99-125. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Sung Y. Park). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.