IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jda/journl/vol.56year2022issue4pp169-192.html

On The Estimation of Tax-Spend Debate In Algeria: Evidence From NARDL Modelling and Asymmetric Causality Test

Author

Listed:
  • Ahlam Makhlouf
  • Mohamed Driouche Dahmani

    (University of Djillali Liabes, Algeria
    University of Djillali Liabes, Algeria)

Abstract

Since its independence, the Algerian economy has dealt with many crises, especially those related to the global oil markets, which are witnessing severe fluctuations, and since Algeria is a rentier economy these crises have threaten its fiscal policy in the last four decades. In such cases, policy-makers have to think wisely about any possible negative effects that may impact the economy through fixing the issue of the adjustment to both spending and revenues. Previous literature assumes a symmetric linkage between government spending and revenue. However, a variation on public revenue does not necessarily have the same impact on public expenditure, or vice-versa. Considering this possible asymmetry between the variables, the main purpose of this study is to examine the asymmetric relationship between government expenditures and revenues in Algeria over the period 1970–2018, and to confirm one of the four hypotheses linked to the tax-spend debate. To characterize asymmetry, this study uses the nonlinear autoregressive distributed lags (NARDL) approach of cointegration developed by Shin et al (2014) between these two variables in the adjustment process of the budgetary. Furthermore, we applied the asymmetric causality approach test using bootstrap simulations with leverage adjustments popularized by Hatemi-J, 2012; Hacker and Hatemi-J, 2012 to determine the causal relationship between variables. The findings provide evidence that suggests that there is a long-run relationship between government expenditures and revenues. To put it differently, in the long run, positive changes in revenue dominate the response of government expenditure. The same applies to the response of spending since positive changes in government expenditure are greater than negative changes. Asymmetric causality results supported a bidirectional causality pattern between public expenditures and revenues in Algeria, thus it supports the fiscal synchronization hypothesis in Algeria. The results of the research are important to increase interest in fiscal policy in Algeria, where under this hypothesis, the fiscal authorities of Algeria must try to raise revenues and work to rationalize public spending simultaneously to control the budget deficit.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahlam Makhlouf & Mohamed Driouche Dahmani, 2022. "On The Estimation of Tax-Spend Debate In Algeria: Evidence From NARDL Modelling and Asymmetric Causality Test," Journal of Developing Areas, Tennessee State University, College of Business, vol. 56(4), pages 169-192, October–D.
  • Handle: RePEc:jda:journl:vol.56:year:2022:issue4:pp:169-192
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://muse.jhu.edu/article/862014
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C32 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables - - - Time-Series Models; Dynamic Quantile Regressions; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models; Diffusion Processes; State Space Models
    • E62 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook - - - Fiscal Policy; Modern Monetary Theory
    • H3 - Public Economics - - Fiscal Policies and Behavior of Economic Agents
    • H61 - Public Economics - - National Budget, Deficit, and Debt - - - Budget; Budget Systems
    • H62 - Public Economics - - National Budget, Deficit, and Debt - - - Deficit; Surplus

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jda:journl:vol.56:year:2022:issue4:pp:169-192. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Abu N.M. Wahid (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cbtnsus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.