IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jda/journl/vol.56year2022issue1pp73-91.html

Gender Heterogeneous Effects of Malaria Risk on Agriculture Productivity: Empirical Evidence from Rural Ethiopia

Author

Listed:
  • Gracious M. Diiro
  • Menale Kassie
  • Beatrice Wambui Muriithi
  • Clifford Maina Mutero

    (International Center of Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE), Kenya
    International Center of Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE), Kenya
    International Center of Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE), Kenya
    International Center of Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE), Kenya and University of Pretoria, South Africa)

Abstract

Debility due to malaria remains a major constraint to economic growth in many Agrarian economies. In the case of Ethiopia, nearly 70% of the population reside in malaria prone areas with focal and multifocal malaria epidemics, presenting a major challenge to subsistence farmers who rely on family labor supply for agricultural production. Various studies have analysed the economic burden of malaria in developing countries, proposing various interventions to reduce its prevalence. These studies have, however, paid little attention to the role of gender in shaping the impact of malaria infections on agricultural labor supply and productivity. There is evidence of existence of complex and diverse gender norms that shape decision making and gender roles in households in many African countries and may influence the risks of malaria infections within households, and access to services for malaria prevention and control. In this study, we examine the direct and indirect effects of malaria risk on agricultural productivity among smallholder farmers. We deviate from previous research in two main aspects: we examine productivity effects of the disease by sex and age of the infected member of the household and estimate the malaria equations using the fractional response model to overcome the limitations of linear and non-linear econometric estimators for bounded data. We find that malaria significantly reduces crop yields and labor productivity. For instance, a 50% increase in malaria prevalence in a household can reduce the per capita land productivity by US$13.4/year, which is about 7.8% reduction in annual per capita income. The estimated loss in labor productivity is about US$1.38/person-day given a 50% rise in malaria prevalence in a household. The results further reveal differential productivity effects of the disease with respect to gender of the household member infected; the effect is greatest when women and children below 14 years in the household fall sick compared to men. The results highlight the need to strengthen women and children’s access to malaria control and prevention services to enhance human health and agricultural productivity. Furthermore, rural development projects may achieve greater health benefits by integrating malaria control interventions with the existing agricultural interventions.

Suggested Citation

  • Gracious M. Diiro & Menale Kassie & Beatrice Wambui Muriithi & Clifford Maina Mutero, 2022. "Gender Heterogeneous Effects of Malaria Risk on Agriculture Productivity: Empirical Evidence from Rural Ethiopia," Journal of Developing Areas, Tennessee State University, College of Business, vol. 56(1), pages 73-91, January-M.
  • Handle: RePEc:jda:journl:vol.56:year:2022:issue1:pp:73-91
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/51/article/835744
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • M1 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration
    • M2 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Economics
    • O1 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development
    • O2 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Development Planning and Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jda:journl:vol.56:year:2022:issue1:pp:73-91. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Abu N.M. Wahid (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cbtnsus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.