IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jda/journl/vol.56year2022issue1pp117-142.html

Participatory Budgeting, Corruption and Government Spending on Education - Evidence Based on Panel Data Analysis for Developed and Developing Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Gabriel Caldas Montes
  • Walter Esteves Piñeiro

    (Universidade Federal Fluminense and CNPq, Brazil
    Universidade Candido Mendes, Brazil)

Abstract

Since people’s direct participation in processes of deliberative decision-making increases both accountability and people’s influence over governmental policies, we expect that when citizens have more power to decide on policy proposals, they decide for more government spending on education. We also expect that participatory budgeting may be even more important in countries perceived as more corrupt. Hence, the aim of this paper is to investigate whether countries with higher levels of participatory budgeting have larger government spending on education, and whether corruption affects government spending on education. The study is based on a sample of 53 countries (21 developed countries and 32 developing countries) for the period between 1996 and 2014. Based on panel data approach, the estimates are made using the least squares method controlling for fixed effects, and dynamic panel data through the system generalized method of moments. The estimates are made for the total sample as well as for both samples of developed and developing countries. Thus, our study contributes to the literature by providing international evidence on the effects of corruption and participatory budgeting on government spending on education, comparing these effects between developed and developing countries. The results indicate that corruption affects government spending on education. When we compare the results, we observe that the coefficients of corruption are higher in the sample of developed countries. Regarding the effects of participatory budgeting, the findings indicate that in countries where popular participation in the preparation and execution of public policies is greater, the allocation of resources in education also tends to be greater; and this effect is even stronger in developed countries. Moreover, the results indicate that when corruption perception worsens, the effect of participatory budgeting on government spending on education is greater, sustaining the importance of participatory budgeting as an aspect capable of strengthening governance and enforcing society’s preferences.

Suggested Citation

  • Gabriel Caldas Montes & Walter Esteves Piñeiro, 2022. "Participatory Budgeting, Corruption and Government Spending on Education - Evidence Based on Panel Data Analysis for Developed and Developing Countries," Journal of Developing Areas, Tennessee State University, College of Business, vol. 56(1), pages 117-142, January-M.
  • Handle: RePEc:jda:journl:vol.56:year:2022:issue1:pp:117-142
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/51/article/835747
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • H52 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Government Expenditures and Education
    • I28 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Government Policy
    • D70 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - General
    • D73 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Bureaucracy; Administrative Processes in Public Organizations; Corruption

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jda:journl:vol.56:year:2022:issue1:pp:117-142. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Abu N.M. Wahid (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cbtnsus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.