IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jda/journl/vol.51year2017issue2pp171-182.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Logistics Capability, Logistics Performance, And The Moderating Effect Of Firm Size: Empirical Evidence From East Coast Malaysia

Author

Listed:
  • Nur Fadiah Binti Mohd Zawawi
  • Sazali Abdul Wahab
  • Abdullah Al Mamun

    (Universiti Malaysia Kelantan, Malaysia)

Abstract

Based on the underlying Resource-Based View (RBV) perspective, the main objective of this study is to empirically examine the relationship of logistics capability and logistics performance, and the moderating effect of firm size on this relationship. This study adopted a cross-sectional design and collected quantitative data from a total of 81 logistic service providers (LSP) registered with the Federation of Malaysian Manufacturers (FMM) Directory of Malaysian Industries 2013, from three states (i.e., Kelantan, Terengganu, and Pahang) in Peninsular Malaysia. This study used the Pearson correlation and the moderated multiple regression (MMR) to test if the logistics capability has a significant positive effect on firm performance and the moderating effect of firm size on the relationship between logistics capability and firm performance. Findings of this study revealed that logistics capability has a significant positive relationship with logistics performance. Logistics service capabilities and flexible capabilities delivered by firms are vital for liner shipping services. Moreover, this relationship is significantly affected by firm size, which suggests that, in comparison, the inclusion of firm size (large vs. medium/small LSPs) in the logistics capability – logistics performance relationship has a significant moderating effect in changing the degree (volume) of performance. The moderating effect of firm size is shown to be capable of changing the nature of relationship and explains the conditions in which capability causes LSPs to perform better. The presence of a significant moderating effect of firm size (large and medium/small LSP firms) exceeded the linear relationship between logistics capability and logistics performance. The study has bridged the literature gaps in such a way that it offers empirical evidence on the moderating effect of firm size on the relationship between logistics capability and logistics performance using a Malaysian sample. In order to foster the economic development through effective logistics services, the logistics services development policies and programs should therefore focus on providing a supportive platform for logistics service providers to improve their capacities, which would ultimately lead to better performance and the sustainability of the logistics service providers in Malaysia.

Suggested Citation

  • Nur Fadiah Binti Mohd Zawawi & Sazali Abdul Wahab & Abdullah Al Mamun, 2017. "Logistics Capability, Logistics Performance, And The Moderating Effect Of Firm Size: Empirical Evidence From East Coast Malaysia," Journal of Developing Areas, Tennessee State University, College of Business, vol. 51(2), pages 171-182, April-Jun.
  • Handle: RePEc:jda:journl:vol.51:year:2017:issue2:pp:171-182
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://muse.jhu.edu/article/657935
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shanlang Lin & Ziyang Chen & Ziwen He, 2021. "Intra-City Industrial Collaborative Agglomeration, Inter-City Network Connectivity and Green Technology Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-25, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Firm Size; Logistics Capability; Logistics Performanceautoregressive models;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R40 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Transportation Economics - - - General
    • R49 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Transportation Economics - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jda:journl:vol.51:year:2017:issue2:pp:171-182. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Abu N.M. Wahid (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cbtnsus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.