IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jda/journl/vol.50year2016issue6pp69-88.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Corporate governance in the GCC countries: Empirical assessment using conventional and non-conventional indices

Author

Listed:
  • Rekha R. Pillai
  • Husam-Aldin Nizar Al-Malkawi

    (Emirates Aviation University, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
    ALHOSN University, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates)

Abstract

The current study focuses on assessing the quality of corporate governance (CG) in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries using conventional and non-conventional indices. The purpose of this paper is threefold. Firstly, to extend the conventional equally-weighted Corporate Governance Index (CGI) developed in Al-Malkawi, Pillai and Bhatti (2014) to include both financial and non-financial companies listed in the GCC stock markets, as the former study limited its CGI application to the non-financial companies. Secondly, apart from computing the CGI for all GCC companies, the present research applies a non-conventional Corporate Governance Deviation Index (CGDI), the first attempt of its kind in the GCC setting, proposed by Fan and Yu (2012) to further underpin the results obtained by the CGI and to provide another dimension to comprehend the governance quality of the GCC countries. Finally, the paper also makes an effort to investigate if any differences persist in CG adherence levels between financial (FIN) and non-financial (NFIN) companies. The result shows that most of the firms operating in the GCC countries adhere to factors considered as ideal for ensuring proper disclosure, board effectiveness and shareholders rights. The outcome of the un-weighted CGI indicates that the UAE tops the position, among the GCC countries, as the country best adopting the internal governance mechanisms studied followed by Oman and Saudi Arabia, respectively. Furthermore, the CGDI result affirms that a higher governance score leads to a lower deviation index and vice versa. The paper also observes that there is a statistically significant difference in CG adherence levels between FIN and NFIN in the GCC setting, with FIN displaying higher levels of CG compliance than NFIN. The findings of this study provide some important implications for managers, policy makers and future research.

Suggested Citation

  • Rekha R. Pillai & Husam-Aldin Nizar Al-Malkawi, 2016. "Corporate governance in the GCC countries: Empirical assessment using conventional and non-conventional indices," Journal of Developing Areas, Tennessee State University, College of Business, vol. 50(6), pages 69-88, Special I.
  • Handle: RePEc:jda:journl:vol.50:year:2016:issue6:pp:69-88
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://muse.jhu.edu/article/626794
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nejla Ould Daoud Ellili, 2023. "Impact of corporate governance on environmental, social, and governance disclosure: Any difference between financial and nonā€financial companies?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(2), pages 858-873, March.
    2. Rekha Pillai & Husam-Aldin N. Al-Malkawi & M. Ishaq Bhatti, 2021. "Assessing Institutional Dynamics of Governance Compliance in Emerging Markets: The GCC Real Estate Sector," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-18, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    corporate governance index (CGI); corporate governance deviation index (CGDI); GCC countries;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G30 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - General
    • G34 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Mergers; Acquisitions; Restructuring; Corporate Governance
    • G38 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Government Policy and Regulation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jda:journl:vol.50:year:2016:issue6:pp:69-88. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Abu N.M. Wahid (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cbtnsus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.