IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jda/journl/vol.50year2016issue6pp333-340.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Meaning of integrity from the upper echelons’ perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Manjit Monga

    (University of South Australia, Australia)

Abstract

Recent corporate disasters have brought leader integrity into limelight and it has become a popular topic for discussion in scholarly literature and popular press. Integrity has been a subject of discussion and debate amongst scholars for a long time, however, there appears to be no consensus in literature on the meaning of integrity and what does it entail. Some scholars equate integrity with actions that demonstrate high moral and ethical standards, for example De George (1993); others like Jensen (2009) call it an ethically and morally neutral term and equate it with the law of gravity. Due to the ambiguities and uncertainties, integrity in management remains a desired and contested topic. The scant empirical research focusses on the followers perceptions of leaders’ integrity, but what does integrity mean to the leaders themselves is not known. It is in this context that the current study aims to draw from the organizational leaders’ understanding, conceptualization and application of integrity in the workplace. How is integrity socially constructed by organizational leaders? What does it mean to them to be acting with integrity in the organizational context? The study employs qualitative research methodology using case study approach and purposive sampling method to select senior executives in the banking industry in South Australia. Data was collected using in depth one on one interviews with the participating informants. The interviews were semi-structured and evolved organically to get the information necessary to answer the research questions. The conversations were analysed using thematic analysis technique to get emic insights into the executives’ view of integrity and how it was applied in the workplace. The findings indicate that for the sample of informants, integrity is about ethical behavior which was expressed by the executives as, ‘doing the right thing’, where the ‘right thing’ meant ethical action. The findings are not supportive of the notion of integrity as a morally neutral concept. The findings of this study are to be used for scoping a larger study aimed at developing an inclusive and unified definition of integrity.

Suggested Citation

  • Manjit Monga, 2016. "Meaning of integrity from the upper echelons’ perspective," Journal of Developing Areas, Tennessee State University, College of Business, vol. 50(6), pages 333-340, Special I.
  • Handle: RePEc:jda:journl:vol.50:year:2016:issue6:pp:333-340
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://muse.jhu.edu/article/626811
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alexander Tan, 2018. "The Effect of Social Capital and Absorptive Capacity through Knowledge Management on Finance Company Performance in Indonesia," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(1), pages 87-101, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Integrity; ethics; morality; responsible leadership; normative; ethical behavior;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M1 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration
    • M14 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jda:journl:vol.50:year:2016:issue6:pp:333-340. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Abu N.M. Wahid (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cbtnsus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.