IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jda/journl/vol.49year2015issue6pp279-291.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“Minsky Moment” and financial fragility : The case of China

Author

Listed:
  • Chaoying Qi
  • James Juniper
  • James Xiaohe Zhang

    (University of Newcastle, Australia)

Abstract

The high GDP growth rate in China has been falling considerably since 2011 and has never got back to the previous amazing double digit number thereafter. Being accompanied by a series of worrisome signs, including booming housing prices and increasing local government debt risk, this situation leads to some pessimistic views concerning the approaching of China’s “Minsky Moment”. However, disagreeing voices exist as well. This paper attempts to assess this controversy from applying Minsky theory. We argue that the heavy debt of local governments may be the main cause for provoking financial fragilities and dragging China into the “Minsky Moment”. We also examine the reasons, size and structure of local governments’ debt, and offer policy recommendations. While Minsky himself and his followers often focus on merely the microeconomic units of banks or firms, we extend the analysis to all the economic sectors including households, firms, foreign sectors, financial institute and government. Both Minsky’s original threefold and Vercelli (2011)’s sixfold taxonomies are applied with empirical data collected from China’s official sources. The calculated results of liquidity ratio and solvency ratio for each economic sector demonstrate that financial institute can be seen as speculative borrowers, while both households and central government are hedge borrowers. However, local governments are in heavy debt. Theoretically, this situation would provoke financial fragility in China, for example, via increasing the non-performing loans. Data analysis indicates that China was not immune to the global financial crisis though it has been less affected from the worldwide recession. In other words, it was nearly in a “Minsky Moment”, while the timely policy adjustment rescued the economy from collapse. Although local government debt situation is now under control and the policy adjustment is on the right track when several local governments are allowed to issue their own bonds, the Chinese economy may still face a risk of approaching the “Minsky Moment”. Additionally, the problems provoked by this trail policy are asking for an urgent need for a fiscal system reform. We thus suggest that more attention should be paid to improving and reforming Chinese fiscal system, particularly to the reforms of the fiscal relationship between central and local governments, the legal framework for local government debt management, expansion of channels for local revenues and readjustments of the tax system.

Suggested Citation

  • Chaoying Qi & James Juniper & James Xiaohe Zhang, 2015. "“Minsky Moment” and financial fragility : The case of China," Journal of Developing Areas, Tennessee State University, College of Business, vol. 49(6), pages 279-291, Special I.
  • Handle: RePEc:jda:journl:vol.49:year:2015:issue6:pp:279-291
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/journal_of_developing_areas/v049/49.6.qi.html
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    “Minsky Moment”; Financial Fragility; Government Debt; Fiscal Policy; Fiscal System;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • B41 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Economic Methodology - - - Economic Methodology
    • C61 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Optimization Techniques; Programming Models; Dynamic Analysis
    • E63 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook - - - Comparative or Joint Analysis of Fiscal and Monetary Policy; Stabilization; Treasury Policy
    • H63 - Public Economics - - National Budget, Deficit, and Debt - - - Debt; Debt Management; Sovereign Debt
    • H72 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - State and Local Budget and Expenditures

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jda:journl:vol.49:year:2015:issue6:pp:279-291. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Abu N.M. Wahid (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cbtnsus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.