IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

World Bank Doing Business Project and the statistical methods based on ranks: the paradox of the time indicator

  • Antonio Cappiello

    ()

The Doing Business (DB) Project of the World Bank has a large impact on media, policy makers and private sector and could have a significant influence on future policies implementation. For these reasons it would be important to better evaluate the rank criteria and avoid the choice of indicators that would possibly alter the nature of the empirical cases. After presenting the general principles of the percentile rank, we focus on the DB criteria for assigning the score to the time indicator. The paradox emerged from the analysis stresses the need of an empirical counterproof in order to avoid significant biases of the nature and the order of the considered phenomenon

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.sieds.it/listing/RePEc/journl/2014LXVIII_1_RIEDS_79_86_Cappiello.pdf
Download Restriction: no

Article provided by SIEDS Societa' Italiana di Economia Demografia e Statistica in its journal RIEDS - Rivista Italiana di Economia Demografia e Statistica.

Volume (Year): LXVIII (2014)
Issue (Month): 1 (January-March)
Pages: 79-86

as
in new window

Handle: RePEc:ite:iteeco:140104
Contact details of provider: Web page: http://www.sieds.it/
More information through EDIRC

Order Information: Web: http://www.sieds.it Email:


No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is featured on the following reading lists or Wikipedia pages:

  1. Ease of doing business index in Wikipedia English ne '')

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ite:iteeco:140104. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Claudio Ceccarelli)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.