IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orserv/v13y2021i3p109-132.html

Who Are the Gatekeepers? An Examination of Diversity in INFORMS Journal Editorial Boards

Author

Listed:
  • Laker J. Newhouse

    (Khan Laboratory School, Mountain View, California 94041)

  • Margaret L. Brandeau

    (Department of Management Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305)

Abstract

Publishing in respected scholarly journals is critical to academic success. However, if journal editorial boards fail to reflect the diversity of thought in a field, worthy work may be overlooked. This study assesses the level of diversity in the editorial boards of the 16 INFORMS journals. We examine gender, whether an individual is an underrepresented minority, and institutional affiliation, and perform a network analysis to identify coauthor relationships between editorial board members. We find that the editorial boards have low levels of diversity: women comprise just under 20% of the editorial board members; fewer than 1% of editorial board members are underrepresented minorities; and 10 institutions (less than 5% of the total) account for more than 25% of the editors. We find a high level of connectivity between editorial board members (as measured by coauthor relationship) for some of the INFORMS journals, suggesting the influence of an “in crowd” of like-minded individuals. INFORMS can and should work to end this state of affairs: we provide a set of actionable recommendations for broadening diversity and reducing connectivity on the INFORMS journal editorial boards. In this way, INFORMS journals can support a diversity of backgrounds and views, enabling the publication of a broader range of ideas and invigorating academic discourse in our profession.

Suggested Citation

  • Laker J. Newhouse & Margaret L. Brandeau, 2021. "Who Are the Gatekeepers? An Examination of Diversity in INFORMS Journal Editorial Boards," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 13(3), pages 109-132, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:orserv:v:13:y:2021:i:3:p:109-132
    DOI: 10.1287/serv.2021.0274
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/serv.2021.0274
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/serv.2021.0274?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mohsen Jadidi & Fariba Karimi & Haiko Lietz & Claudia Wagner, 2018. "Gender Disparities In Science? Dropout, Productivity, Collaborations And Success Of Male And Female Computer Scientists," Advances in Complex Systems (ACS), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(03n04), pages 1-23, May.
    2. repec:eme:aaaj00:aaaj-08-2014-1785 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Alpa Dhanani & Michael John Jones, 2017. "Editorial boards of accounting journals: gender diversity and internationalisation," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 30(5), pages 1008-1040, June.
    4. repec:plo:pone00:0114302 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Chad M Topaz & Shilad Sen, 2016. "Gender Representation on Journal Editorial Boards in the Mathematical Sciences," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(8), pages 1-21, August.
    6. Bas Hofstra & Vivek V. Kulkarni & Sebastian Munoz-Najar Galvez & Bryan He & Dan Jurafsky & Daniel A. McFarland, 2020. "The Diversity–Innovation Paradox in Science," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 117(17), pages 9284-9291, April.
    7. repec:plo:pone00:0079147 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Romero-Silva, Rodrigo & Marsillac, Erika & de Leeuw, Sander, 2025. "Dominance of leading business schools in top journals: Insights for increasing institutional representation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(3).
    2. Sümeyye Akça & Özlem Şenyurt, 2023. "Geographical representation of editorial boards: a review in the field of library and information sciences," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(2), pages 1409-1427, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fengyuan Liu & Petter Holme & Matteo Chiesa & Bedoor AlShebli & Talal Rahwan, 2023. "Gender inequality and self-publication are common among academic editors," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 7(3), pages 353-364, March.
    2. Kwiek, Marek & Roszka, Wojciech, 2021. "Gender-based homophily in research: A large-scale study of man-woman collaboration," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 15(3).
    3. Barbara Bedowska-Sójka & Claudia Tarantola & Codruta Mare & Alessia Paccagnini & Belma Öztürkkal & Galena Pisoni & Albulena Shala & Rezarta Perri & Hanna Kristín Skaftadótti, 2025. "Editorial Boards of Finance Journals: The Gender Gap and Social Networks," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 200(3), pages 669-687, September.
    4. Josh Yamamoto & Eitan Frachtenberg, 2022. "Gender Differences in Collaboration Patterns in Computer Science," Publications, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-21, February.
    5. Wu, Lingfei & Kittur, Aniket & Youn, Hyejin & Milojević, Staša & Leahey, Erin & Fiore, Stephen M. & Ahn, Yong-Yeol, 2022. "Metrics and mechanisms: Measuring the unmeasurable in the science of science," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 16(2).
    6. Theodore C. Masters-Waage & Juan M. Madera & Ebenezer Edema-Sillo & Ally St. Aubin & Peggy Lindner & Maritza Gaytan & Heyao Yu & Christiane Spitzmueller, 2026. "Evaluating multiple candidates simultaneously reduces racial disparities in promotion and tenure," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 17(1), pages 1-13, December.
    7. Cam, Olga & Ballantine, Joan, 2026. "Exploring accounting academics’ views on sustainability: A Freirean dialogical pedagogic perspective," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 58(1).
    8. Avijit Gayen & Somyajit Chakraborty & Saikat Mitra & Angshuman Jana, 2025. "Comeback or dropout: study of discontinued researchers at early career stage," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 130(2), pages 1201-1236, February.
    9. Huidong Wu & Jianping Li & Dengsheng Wu, 2026. "Authenticity or self-advocacy? Identifying the credibility of positive words in scientific titles and abstracts," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 131(1), pages 209-234, January.
    10. Corinne Cortese & Claire Wright, 2018. "Developing a Community of Practice: Michael Gaffikin and Critical Accounting Research," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 54(3), pages 247-276, September.
    11. Yang, Yunhan & Zhang, Chenwei & Xu, Huimin & Bu, Yi & Liu, Meijun & Ding, Ying, 2025. "Gender differences in dropout rate: From field, career status, and generation perspectives," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 19(1).
    12. Zhou, Sifan & Chai, Sen & Freeman, Richard B., 2024. "Gender homophily: In-group citation preferences and the gender disadvantage," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(1).
    13. Lin, Yiling & Evans, James A. & Wu, Lingfei, 2022. "New directions in science emerge from disconnection and discord," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 16(1).
    14. Francisco González Sala & Julia Osca Lluch & Francisco Tortosa Gil & María Peñaranda Ortega, 2017. "Characteristics of monographic special issues in Ibero-American psychology journals: visibility and relevance for authors and publishers," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 112(2), pages 1069-1077, August.
    15. Shen, Hongquan & Xie, Juan & Ao, Weiyi & Cheng, Ying, 2022. "The continuity and citation impact of scientific collaboration with different gender composition," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 16(1).
    16. Shen, Hongquan & Cheng, Ying & Ju, Xiufang & Xie, Juan, 2022. "Rethinking the effect of inter-gender collaboration on research performance for scholars," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 16(4).
    17. Chad M. Topaz & Jude Higdon & Avriel Epps-Darling & Ethan Siau & Harper Kerkhoff & Shivani Mendiratta & Eric Young, 2022. "Race- and gender-based under-representation of creative contributors: art, fashion, film, and music," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-11, December.
    18. Manuel Goyanes & Luis de-Marcos, 2020. "Academic influence and invisible colleges through editorial board interlocking in communication sciences: a social network analysis of leading journals," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 123(2), pages 791-811, May.
    19. Wei Fu & Shin-Yi Chou & Li-San Wang, 2026. "NIH grant expansion, ancestral diversity, and scientific collaborations in genomics research," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 39(1), pages 1-42, March.
    20. Josep Maria Argilés-Bosch & Yuliya Kasperskaya & Josep Garcia-Blandon & Diego Ravenda, 2025. "The interplay of author and editor gender in acceptance delays: evidence from accounting journals," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 130(3), pages 1939-1965, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orserv:v:13:y:2021:i:3:p:109-132. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.