IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ororsc/v35y2024i2p741-768.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do Lower-Power Individuals Really Compete Less? An Investigation of Covert Competition

Author

Listed:
  • Yufei Zhong

    (Scheller College of Business, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30308)

  • Huisi (Jessica) Li

    (Foster School of Business, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195)

Abstract

Competition is one of the defining features of organizational life. In this research, we identify a prevalent but overlooked type of competition—covert competition, which we define as behaviors with the intention to win (i.e., advancing one’s interest/position while disregarding or hurting the other party’s interest/position) that are unclear to or hidden from the other party. We argue that one’s relative power in dyadic social relationships influences covert competition. Based on the theory of power dependence, we expect that lower-power individuals are more likely than higher-power individuals to compete covertly. This is because lower-power individuals fear the potential negative repercussions of revealing their competitiveness, which motivates them to engage in more covert competition. Lower-power individuals’ ability to escape from the current relationship mitigates the effects of having lower power on such fear and on their subsequent covert competition. With five experiments and a three-wave longitudinal survey study, we find support for our hypotheses. This research calls attention to the understudied covert form of competition and emphasizes the nuanced relationships between power and competitive behaviors.

Suggested Citation

  • Yufei Zhong & Huisi (Jessica) Li, 2024. "Do Lower-Power Individuals Really Compete Less? An Investigation of Covert Competition," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(2), pages 741-768, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:35:y:2024:i:2:p:741-768
    DOI: 10.1287/orsc.2023.1684
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2023.1684
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/orsc.2023.1684?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:35:y:2024:i:2:p:741-768. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.