IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ororsc/v34y2023i6p2163-2181.html

Context and Aggregation: An Experimental Study of Bias and Discrimination in Organizational Decisions

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Christensen

    (Strategic Organization Design Unit, University of Southern Denmark, DK-5230 Odense M, Denmark)

  • Christian M. Dahl

    (Department of Economics, University of Southern Denmark, DK-5230 Odense M, Denmark)

  • Thorbjørn Knudsen

    (Strategic Organization Design Unit, University of Southern Denmark, DK-5230 Odense M, Denmark; Frankfurt School of Finance and Management; Danish Institute for Advanced Study, University of Southern Denmark, DK-5230 Odense M, Denmark)

  • Massimo Warglien

    (Center for Experimental Research in Management and Economics, Department of Management, Ca' Foscari University of Venice, 30123 Venice, Italy)

Abstract

This paper addresses a notable gap at the intersection of organizational economics and organization science: how does organizational context influence aggregation of individual behavior in organizational decisions? Using basic centralized versus decentralized organizational structures as building blocks for our experimental design, we examine whether assignment of organizational positions, incentive schemes, and structural configuration induce endogenous adaptation in the form of change in reservation levels (bias) or modified discrimination capability in subjects’ behavior. We found that evaluators adapted their reservation and discrimination levels in centralized structures, whereas they did not generally adapt their reservation and discrimination levels when placed in decentralized structures. We identify mechanisms that explain these findings; explain how they influence aggregate, organizational behavior; and discuss implications for research and practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Christensen & Christian M. Dahl & Thorbjørn Knudsen & Massimo Warglien, 2023. "Context and Aggregation: An Experimental Study of Bias and Discrimination in Organizational Decisions," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(6), pages 2163-2181, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:34:y:2023:i:6:p:2163-2181
    DOI: 10.1287/orsc.2021.1502
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2021.1502
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/orsc.2021.1502?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Giovanni Gavetti & Daniel A. Levinthal & Jan W. Rivkin, 2005. "Strategy making in novel and complex worlds: the power of analogy," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(8), pages 691-712, August.
    2. Felipe A. Csaszar & J. P. Eggers, 2013. "Organizational Decision Making: An Information Aggregation View," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(10), pages 2257-2277, October.
    3. Ranjay Gulati & Paul R. Lawrence & Phanish Puranam, 2005. "Adaptation in vertical relationships: beyond incentive conflict," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(5), pages 415-440, May.
    4. Sah, Raaj Kumar & Stiglitz, Joseph E, 1985. "Human Fallibility and Economic Organization," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 75(2), pages 292-297, May.
    5. Jan W. Rivkin & Nicolaj Siggelkow, 2007. "Patterned Interactions in Complex Systems: Implications for Exploration," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(7), pages 1068-1085, July.
    6. Felipe A. Csaszar, 2012. "Organizational structure as a determinant of performance: Evidence from mutual funds," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(6), pages 611-632, June.
    7. Felipe A. Csaszar, 2013. "An Efficient Frontier in Organization Design: Organizational Structure as a Determinant of Exploration and Exploitation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(4), pages 1083-1101, August.
    8. Sah, Raaj Kumar & Stiglitz, Joseph E, 1986. "The Architecture of Economic Systems: Hierarchies and Polyarchies," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 76(4), pages 716-727, September.
    9. Markus Reitzig & Boris Maciejovsky, 2015. "Corporate hierarchy and vertical information flow inside the firm—a behavioral view," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(13), pages 1979-1999, December.
    10. Christina Fang, 2012. "Organizational Learning as Credit Assignment: A Model and Two Experiments," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(6), pages 1717-1732, December.
    11. Devetag, Giovanna & Warglien, Massimo, 2003. "Games and phone numbers: Do short-term memory bounds affect strategic behavior?," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 24(2), pages 189-202, April.
    12. Colin F. Camerer & Teck-Hua Ho & Juin-Kuan Chong, 2004. "A Cognitive Hierarchy Model of Games," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 119(3), pages 861-898.
    13. Thorbjørn Knudsen & Daniel A. Levinthal, 2007. "Two Faces of Search: Alternative Generation and Alternative Evaluation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(1), pages 39-54, February.
    14. McKelvey Richard D. & Palfrey Thomas R., 1995. "Quantal Response Equilibria for Normal Form Games," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 10(1), pages 6-38, July.
    15. Schotter Andrew & Weigelt Keith & Wilson Charles, 1994. "A Laboratory Investigation of Multiperson Rationality and Presentation Effects," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 6(3), pages 445-468, May.
    16. Michael Christensen & Thorbjørn Knudsen, 2020. "Division of roles and endogenous specialization," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 29(1), pages 105-124.
    17. Sah, Raaj Kumar & Stiglitz, Joseph E, 1988. "Committees, Hierarchies and Polyarchies," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 98(391), pages 451-470, June.
    18. Daniel L. McFadden, 1976. "Quantal Choice Analysis: A Survey," NBER Chapters, in: Annals of Economic and Social Measurement, Volume 5, number 4, pages 363-390, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    19. Brad M. Barber & Terrance Odean, 2001. "Boys will be Boys: Gender, Overconfidence, and Common Stock Investment," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 116(1), pages 261-292.
    20. Dan Lovallo & Colin Camerer, 1999. "Overconfidence and Excess Entry: An Experimental Approach," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 89(1), pages 306-318, March.
    21. Michael Christensen & Thorbjørn Knudsen, 2010. "Design of Decision-Making Organizations," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 56(1), pages 71-89, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sanghyun Park & Cleotilde Gonzalez & Phanish Puranam, 2025. "Decision Centralization and Learning from Experience in Groups: Separating Context from Aggregation Effects," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(8), pages 6859-6879, August.
    2. Tianyu He & Marco S. Minervini & Phanish Puranam, 2024. "How Groups Differ from Individuals in Learning from Experience: Evidence from a Contest Platform," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(4), pages 1512-1534, July.
    3. Nguyen, Tessa Tien & Le, Angelina Nhat Hanh & Johnston, Wesley J. & Cheng, Julian Ming Sung, 2025. "When learning from limited experience takes off: Linear/curvilinear relationships between decision-making comprehensiveness and sustainable supply chain performance under contingent conditions," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    4. Dmitry Sharapov & Linus Dahlander, 2025. "Selection Regimes and Selection Errors," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(6), pages 2324-2348, November.
    5. Sheen S. Levine & Oliver Schilke & Olenka Kacperczyk & Lynne G. Zucker, 2023. "Primer for Experimental Methods in Organization Theory," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(6), pages 1997-2025, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Henning Piezunka & Oliver Schilke, 2023. "The Dual Function of Organizational Structure: Aggregating and Shaping Individuals’ Votes," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(5), pages 1914-1937, September.
    2. Felipe A. Csaszar & John C. Eklund, 2026. "Revisiting the Unitary Actor Assumption: Toward Realistic Aggregation of Individual Preferences in Strategy Research," Papers 2602.20518, arXiv.org.
    3. Friederike Wall, 2016. "Agent-based modeling in managerial science: an illustrative survey and study," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 135-193, January.
    4. Jaeho Choi & Daniel Levinthal, 2023. "Wisdom in the Wild: Generalization and Adaptive Dynamics," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(3), pages 1073-1089, May.
    5. Harsh Ketkar & Maciej Workiewicz, 2022. "Power to the people: The benefits and limits of employee self‐selection in organizations," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(5), pages 935-963, May.
    6. Henning Piezunka & Vikas A. Aggarwal & Hart E. Posen, 2022. "The Aggregation–Learning Trade-off," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(3), pages 1094-1115, May.
    7. Jose P. Arrieta & Yash R. Shrestha, 2022. "On the strategic value of equifinal choice," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 11(2), pages 37-45, June.
    8. Dmitry Sharapov & Linus Dahlander, 2025. "Selection Regimes and Selection Errors," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(6), pages 2324-2348, November.
    9. Dongil D. Keum & Kelly E. See, 2017. "The Influence of Hierarchy on Idea Generation and Selection in the Innovation Process," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(4), pages 653-669, August.
    10. Oliver Baumann, 2015. "Models of complex adaptive systems in strategy and organization research," Mind & Society: Cognitive Studies in Economics and Social Sciences, Springer;Fondazione Rosselli, vol. 14(2), pages 169-183, November.
    11. Paola Criscuolo & Linus Dahlander & Thorsten Grohsjean & Ammon Salter, 2021. "The Sequence Effect in Panel Decisions: Evidence from the Evaluation of Research and Development Projects," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(4), pages 987-1008, July.
    12. Helge Klapper & Henning Piezunka & Linus Dahlander, 2024. "Peer Evaluations: Evaluating and Being Evaluated," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(4), pages 1363-1387, July.
    13. Sáenz-Royo, Carlos & Lozano-Rojo, Álvaro, 2023. "Authoritarianism versus participation in innovation decisions," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    14. Nektarios Oraiopoulos & Stylianos Kavadias, 2020. "Is Diversity (Un-)Biased? Project Selection Decisions in Executive Committees," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(5), pages 906-924, September.
    15. Michael Christensen & Thorbjørn Knudsen, 2020. "Division of roles and endogenous specialization," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 29(1), pages 105-124.
    16. Felipe A. Csaszar & J. P. Eggers, 2013. "Organizational Decision Making: An Information Aggregation View," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(10), pages 2257-2277, October.
    17. Felipe A. Csaszar, 2013. "An Efficient Frontier in Organization Design: Organizational Structure as a Determinant of Exploration and Exploitation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(4), pages 1083-1101, August.
    18. Carlos Sáenz-Royo & Francisco Chiclana & Enrique Herrera-Viedma, 2022. "Functional Representation of the Intentional Bounded Rationality of Decision-Makers: A Laboratory to Study the Decisions a Priori," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-17, February.
    19. Andres Felipe Cortes & Andreea N. Kiss, 2023. "Is managerial discretion high in small firms? A theoretical framework," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 60(1), pages 157-172, January.
    20. Amit Kumar & Elisa Operti, 2023. "Missed chances and unfulfilled hopes: Why do firms make errors in evaluating technological opportunities?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(13), pages 3067-3097, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:34:y:2023:i:6:p:2163-2181. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.