IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ororsc/v33y2022i4p1620-1644.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Beyond Spatial Proximity: The Impact of Enhanced Spatial Connectedness from New Bridges on Entrepreneurship

Author

Listed:
  • Sunasir Dutta

    (University of Minnesota Carlson School of Management, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455)

  • Daniel Erian Armanios

    (Saïd Business School, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 1HP, United Kingdom)

  • Jaison D. Desai

    (Technical Warfare Center, U.S. Army Cyber Command, Fort Belvoir, Virginia 22060)

Abstract

Various strands of work have explored how spatial proximity helps (metaphorically) bridge barriers to resource mobilization and foster knowledge transfer. However, much of that work takes spatial connectedness as a given. We argue that spatial connectedness is a distinct construct that affects the extent to which spaces are not just proximate but are actually able to link people, ideas, resources, and knowledge together. We explore one such source of connectedness—physical (not metaphorical) bridges. We find that the opening of newly built bridges enhances startup founding in the local geographic community. Beyond their impact on startup founding, newly built bridges also influence the organizing process for such ventures. This includes a positive impact on the entry of prospective founders into entrepreneurship and an increase in the number of early-stage investors. The subsequently founded ventures are also more likely to engage in recombination and to cross industry boundaries. We explore scope conditions around industry and connective heterogeneity. We also test for robustness to various modeling approaches. The discussion highlights contributions of these findings to the study of entrepreneurship, as well as of organizations and the institutional fields in which they operate.

Suggested Citation

  • Sunasir Dutta & Daniel Erian Armanios & Jaison D. Desai, 2022. "Beyond Spatial Proximity: The Impact of Enhanced Spatial Connectedness from New Bridges on Entrepreneurship," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(4), pages 1620-1644, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:33:y:2022:i:4:p:1620-1644
    DOI: 10.1287/orsc.2021.1504
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2021.1504
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/orsc.2021.1504?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:33:y:2022:i:4:p:1620-1644. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.