IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ororsc/v32y2021i6p1492-1522.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Women in the Inner Circle: Gender and Director Networks After the Fracturing of the Corporate Elite

Author

Listed:
  • Richard A. Benton

    (School of Labor and Employment Relations, University of Illinois, Champaign, Illinois 61820)

Abstract

Over the past two decades, women have increased their representation among multiboard directors—corporate directors who simultaneously hold seats on two or more firms. Traditionally, multiboard directors exercised greater power and influence in corporate governance. As a consequence, women’s increased representation among this “inner circle” could signal women’s increased influence in corporate governance. However, women’s access to these elite positions comes at a time when multiboard holding has declined. This paper investigates gendered patterns in access to and outcomes of multiboard holding. I argue that these patterns reflect gendered logics in director appointment practices such that firms increasingly recruit and appoint highly boarded female directors, but multiboard women continue to lag in substantive influence in the boardroom. Analyses of nearly two decades of data on S&P 1500 boards demonstrate female directors’ increased access to the corporate inner-circle, but this access is decoupled from increased participation in board committees and interorganizational social influence. I discuss implications for theory on gender tokenism, corporate networks, and board processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard A. Benton, 2021. "Women in the Inner Circle: Gender and Director Networks After the Fracturing of the Corporate Elite," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(6), pages 1492-1522, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:32:y:2021:i:6:p:1492-1522
    DOI: 10.1287/orsc.2021.1433
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2021.1433
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/orsc.2021.1433?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:32:y:2021:i:6:p:1492-1522. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.