IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/oropre/v11y1963i5p787-794.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Optimum Allocation of Different Weapons to a Target Complex

Author

Listed:
  • F. Lemus

    (SHAPE Air Defence Technical Centre, The Hague, Netherlands)

  • K. H. David

    (SHAPE Air Defence Technical Centre, The Hague, Netherlands)

Abstract

How best to allocate offensive weapons of various types to a group of targets in order to maximize the payoff constitutes a very important problem for optimizing strategies of defense. Solutions to the allocation problem, for the case where one type of weapon is involved, exist in the literature. Essentially these solutions fall into two categories digital solutions which yield integral results, and analytical solutions, based on the Lagrange Multipliers, which treat the number of weapons as a continuous variable and thus produce fractional answers. Whenever the number of weapons is large compared with the number of targets, analytical methods are preferred to digital ones because they achieve a saving in computer time at a negligible loss of accuracy. On the other hand, if the number of weapons is of the same order of magnitude as the number of targets, digital methods are preferable because they yield exact answers, as opposed to analytical solutions that produce rounding errors too large to render the results useful. The object of this paper is to generalize an analytical solution to the case where the attacker has more than one type of weapon available for assignment to an undefended or virtually undefended target complex. Defense strategies are not included. The paper presents a computational example where three types of weapons, each with a different number of attacking vehicles, are allocated to twenty targets. This example also permits a comparison between the fractional results of an analytical solution and the integral values obtained by a computer-oriented algorithm.

Suggested Citation

  • F. Lemus & K. H. David, 1963. "An Optimum Allocation of Different Weapons to a Target Complex," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 11(5), pages 787-794, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:11:y:1963:i:5:p:787-794
    DOI: 10.1287/opre.11.5.787
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.11.5.787
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/opre.11.5.787?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ojeong Kwon & Donghan Kang & Kyungsik Lee & Sungsoo Park, 1999. "Lagrangian relaxation approach to the targeting problem," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 46(6), pages 640-653, September.
    2. Hohzaki, Ryusuke & Nagashima, Shinichi, 2009. "A Stackelberg equilibrium for a missile procurement problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 193(1), pages 238-249, February.
    3. Hughes, Michael S. & Lunday, Brian J., 2022. "The Weapon Target Assignment Problem: Rational Inference of Adversary Target Utility Valuations from Observed Solutions," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    4. Anissa Frini & Adel Guitouni & Abderrezak Benaskeur, 2017. "Solving Dynamic Multi-Criteria Resource-Target Allocation Problem Under Uncertainty: A Comparison of Decomposition and Myopic Approaches," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(06), pages 1465-1496, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:11:y:1963:i:5:p:787-794. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.