IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormsom/v25y2023i1p235-253.html

Real-Time Integrated Learning and Decision Making for Cumulative Shock Degradation

Author

Listed:
  • Collin Drent

    (Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven 5600 MB, Netherlands)

  • Melvin Drent

    (Department of Industrial Engineering and Innovation Sciences, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven 5600 MB, Netherlands)

  • Joachim Arts

    (Luxembourg Centre for Logistics and Supply Chain Management, University of Luxembourg, L-1359 Luxembourg City, Luxembourg)

  • Stella Kapodistria

    (Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven 5600 MB, Netherlands)

Abstract

Problem definition : Unexpected failures of equipment can have severe consequences and costs. Such unexpected failures can be prevented by performing preventive replacement based on real-time degradation data. We study a component that degrades according to a compound Poisson process and fails when the degradation exceeds the failure threshold. An online sensor measures the degradation in real time, but interventions are only possible during planned downtime. Academic/practical relevance : We characterize the optimal replacement policy that integrates real-time learning from the online sensor. We demonstrate the effectiveness in practice with a case study on interventional x-ray machines. The data set of this case study is available in the online companion. As such, it can serve as a benchmark data set for future studies on stochastically deteriorating systems. Methodology : The degradation parameters vary from one component to the next but cannot be observed directly; the component population is heterogeneous. These parameters must therefore be inferred by observing the real-time degradation signal. We model this situation as a partially observable Markov decision process (POMDP) so that decision making and learning are integrated. We collapse the information state space of this POMDP to three dimensions so that optimal policies can be analyzed and computed tractably. Results : The optimal policy is a state dependent control limit. The control limit increases with age but may decrease as a result of other information in the degradation signal. Numerical case study analyses reveal that integration of learning and decision making leads to cost reductions of 10.50% relative to approaches that do not learn from the real-time signal and 4.28% relative to approaches that separate learning and decision making. Managerial implications : Real-time sensor information can reduce the cost of maintenance and unplanned downtime by a considerable amount. The integration of learning and decision making is tractably possible for industrial systems with our state space collapse. Finally, the benefit of our model increases with the amount of data available for initial model calibration, whereas additional data are much less valuable for approaches that ignore population heterogeneity.

Suggested Citation

  • Collin Drent & Melvin Drent & Joachim Arts & Stella Kapodistria, 2023. "Real-Time Integrated Learning and Decision Making for Cumulative Shock Degradation," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 25(1), pages 235-253, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:25:y:2023:i:1:p:235-253
    DOI: 10.1287/msom.2022.1149
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/msom.2022.1149
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/msom.2022.1149?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Li Chen & Adam J.Mersereau & Zhe (Frank) Wang, 2017. "Optimal Merchandise Testing with Limited Inventory," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(4), pages 968-991, August.
    2. Li Chen & Erica L. Plambeck, 2008. "Dynamic Inventory Management with Learning About the Demand Distribution and Substitution Probability," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 10(2), pages 236-256, May.
    3. Katy S. Azoury, 1985. "Bayes Solution to Dynamic Inventory Models Under Unknown Demand Distribution," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(9), pages 1150-1160, September.
    4. Ciriaco Valdez‐Flores & Richard M. Feldman, 1989. "A survey of preventive maintenance models for stochastically deteriorating single‐unit systems," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(4), pages 419-446, August.
    5. V. Makis & X. Jiang, 2003. "Optimal Replacement Under Partial Observations," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(2), pages 382-394, May.
    6. Li Chen, 2021. "Fixing Phantom Stockouts: Optimal Data‐Driven Shelf Inspection Policies," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(3), pages 689-702, March.
    7. Donald Rosenfield, 1976. "Markovian Deterioration with Uncertain Information," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(1), pages 141-155, February.
    8. Vincent W. Slaugh & Bahar Biller & Sridhar R. Tayur, 2016. "Managing Rentals with Usage-Based Loss," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 18(3), pages 429-444, July.
    9. Scarf, Philip A., 1997. "On the application of mathematical models in maintenance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 99(3), pages 493-506, June.
    10. Chen, Nan & Ye, Zhi-Sheng & Xiang, Yisha & Zhang, Linmiao, 2015. "Condition-based maintenance using the inverse Gaussian degradation model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 243(1), pages 190-199.
    11. William P. Pierskalla & John A. Voelker, 1976. "A survey of maintenance models: The control and surveillance of deteriorating systems," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(3), pages 353-388, September.
    12. Michael Jong Kim & Viliam Makis, 2013. "Joint Optimization of Sampling and Control of Partially Observable Failing Systems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(3), pages 777-790, June.
    13. Akram Khaleghei & Michael Jong Kim, 2021. "Optimal Control of Partially Observable Semi-Markovian Failing Systems: An Analysis Using a Phase Methodology," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 69(4), pages 1282-1304, July.
    14. Li Chen, 2010. "Bounds and Heuristics for Optimal Bayesian Inventory Control with Unobserved Lost Sales," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(2), pages 396-413, April.
    15. Cyrus Derman, 1963. "Optimal Replacement and Maintenance Under Markovian Deterioration with Probability Bounds on Failure," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 9(3), pages 478-481, April.
    16. Rong Li & Jing‐Sheng Jeannette Song & Shuxiao Sun & Xiaona Zheng, 2022. "Fight inventory shrinkage: Simultaneous learning of inventory level and shrinkage rate," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(6), pages 2477-2491, June.
    17. Linmiao Zhang & Yong Lei & Houcai Shen, 2016. "How heterogeneity influences condition-based maintenance for gamma degradation process," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(19), pages 5829-5841, October.
    18. Sheldon M. Ross, 1969. "A Markovian Replacement Model with a Generalization to Include Stocking," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(11), pages 702-715, July.
    19. Alaa H. Elwany & Nagi Z. Gebraeel & Lisa M. Maillart, 2011. "Structured Replacement Policies for Components with Complex Degradation Processes and Dedicated Sensors," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 59(3), pages 684-695, June.
    20. Peter Kolesar, 1966. "Minimum Cost Replacement Under Markovian Deterioration," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 12(9), pages 694-706, May.
    21. Kurt, Murat & Kharoufeh, Jeffrey P., 2010. "Optimally maintaining a Markovian deteriorating system with limited imperfect repairs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 205(2), pages 368-380, September.
    22. Wang, Hongzhou, 2002. "A survey of maintenance policies of deteriorating systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(3), pages 469-489, June.
    23. de Jonge, Bram & Scarf, Philip A., 2020. "A review on maintenance optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(3), pages 805-824.
    24. Chiel van Oosterom & Hao Peng & Geert-Jan van Houtum, 2017. "Maintenance optimization for a Markovian deteriorating system with population heterogeneity," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(1), pages 96-109, January.
    25. Olde Keizer, Minou C.A. & Teunter, Ruud H. & Veldman, Jasper, 2017. "Joint condition-based maintenance and inventory optimization for systems with multiple components," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 257(1), pages 209-222.
    26. van Staden, Heletjé E. & Boute, Robert N., 2021. "The effect of multi-sensor data on condition-based maintenance policies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(2), pages 585-600.
    27. Nicole DeHoratius & Adam J. Mersereau & Linus Schrage, 2008. "Retail Inventory Management When Records Are Inaccurate," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 10(2), pages 257-277, November.
    28. Michael Jong Kim, 2016. "Robust Control of Partially Observable Failing Systems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 64(4), pages 999-1014, August.
    29. Donald Rosenfield, 1976. "Markovian Deterioration With Uncertain Information — A More General Model," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(3), pages 389-405, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rozas, Heraldo & Xie, Weijun & Gebraeel, Nagi & Robinson, Stephen, 2026. "Data-driven joint optimization of maintenance and spare parts provisioning: A distributionally robust approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 328(1), pages 122-136.
    2. Loeys, Stijn & Boute, Robert N. & Antonio, Katrien, 2025. "The use of IoT sensor data to dynamically assess maintenance risk in service contracts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 324(2), pages 454-465.
    3. Arts, Joachim & Boute, Robert N. & Loeys, Stijn & van Staden, Heletjé E., 2025. "Fifty years of maintenance optimization: Reflections and perspectives," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 322(3), pages 725-739.
    4. Collin Drent & Melvin Drent & Joachim Arts, 2024. "Condition-Based Production for Stochastically Deteriorating Systems: Optimal Policies and Learning," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 26(3), pages 1137-1156, May.
    5. Ece Zeliha Demirci & Joachim Arts & Geert-Jan van Houtum, 2025. "A restless bandit approach for capacitated condition based maintenance scheduling," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 179-207, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arts, Joachim & Boute, Robert N. & Loeys, Stijn & van Staden, Heletjé E., 2025. "Fifty years of maintenance optimization: Reflections and perspectives," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 322(3), pages 725-739.
    2. Deep, Akash & Zhou, Shiyu & Veeramani, Dharmaraj & Chen, Yong, 2023. "Partially observable Markov decision process-based optimal maintenance planning with time-dependent observations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 311(2), pages 533-544.
    3. de Jonge, Bram & Scarf, Philip A., 2020. "A review on maintenance optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(3), pages 805-824.
    4. David T. Abdul‐Malak & Jeffrey P. Kharoufeh & Lisa M. Maillart, 2019. "Maintaining systems with heterogeneous spare parts," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 66(6), pages 485-501, September.
    5. Ya-Tang Chuang & Michael Jong Kim, 2023. "Bayesian Inventory Control: Accelerated Demand Learning via Exploration Boosts," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 71(5), pages 1515-1529, September.
    6. Kasuya, Mizuki & Jin, Lu, 2025. "Condition-based maintenance policy for deteriorating systems based on Wiener process with heterogeneous spare unit population and partial observation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    7. Eggertsson, Ragnar & Eruguz, Ayse Sena & Basten, Rob & Maillart, Lisa M., 2025. "Maintenance optimization for multi-component systems with a single sensor," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 320(3), pages 559-569.
    8. Collin Drent & Melvin Drent & Joachim Arts, 2024. "Condition-Based Production for Stochastically Deteriorating Systems: Optimal Policies and Learning," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 26(3), pages 1137-1156, May.
    9. Zhenwei Luo & Pengfei Guo & Yulan Wang, 2023. "Manage Inventories with Learning on Demands and Buy-up Substitution Probability," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 25(2), pages 563-580, March.
    10. Qiuzhuang Sun & Jiawen Hu & Zhi-Sheng Ye, 2025. "Optimal Abort Policy for Mission-Critical Systems Under Imperfect Condition Monitoring," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 73(5), pages 2396-2416, September.
    11. Abderrahmane Abbou & Viliam Makis, 2026. "Event-Triggered Bayesian Control Chart," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 74(1), pages 530-549, January.
    12. Ece Zeliha Demirci & Joachim Arts & Geert-Jan van Houtum, 2025. "A restless bandit approach for capacitated condition based maintenance scheduling," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 179-207, March.
    13. Alaswad, Suzan & Xiang, Yisha, 2017. "A review on condition-based maintenance optimization models for stochastically deteriorating system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 54-63.
    14. Hao Zhang & Weihua Zhang, 2023. "Analytical Solution to a Partially Observable Machine Maintenance Problem with Obvious Failures," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(7), pages 3993-4015, July.
    15. Rong Li & Jing‐Sheng Jeannette Song & Shuxiao Sun & Xiaona Zheng, 2022. "Fight inventory shrinkage: Simultaneous learning of inventory level and shrinkage rate," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(6), pages 2477-2491, June.
    16. Michiel A. J. uit het Broek & Ruud H. Teunter & Bram de Jonge & Jasper Veldman & Nicky D. Van Foreest, 2020. "Condition-Based Production Planning: Adjusting Production Rates to Balance Output and Failure Risk," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(4), pages 792-811, July.
    17. Zhu, Zhicheng & Xiang, Yisha & Zhao, Ming & Shi, Yue, 2023. "Data-driven remanufacturing planning with parameter uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(1), pages 102-116.
    18. Zhang, Zhengxin & Si, Xiaosheng & Hu, Changhua & Lei, Yaguo, 2018. "Degradation data analysis and remaining useful life estimation: A review on Wiener-process-based methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(3), pages 775-796.
    19. Hu, Han & Bansal, Vipul & Zhou, Shiyu, 2026. "Condition-based maintenance planning for K-out-of-N systems under partial observability," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 267(PB).
    20. Cai, Yue & de Jonge, Bram & Teunter, Ruud H., 2025. "Data-driven condition-based maintenance optimization given limited data," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 324(1), pages 324-334.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:25:y:2023:i:1:p:235-253. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.