IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormsom/v24y2022i5p2629-2647.html

The Implications of Strategic Inventory for Short-Term vs. Long-Term Supply Contracts in Nonexclusive Reselling Environments

Author

Listed:
  • Abhishek Roy

    (Department of Statistics, Operations, and Data Science, Fox School of Business, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19122)

  • Stephen M. Gilbert

    (Department of Information, Risk, and Operations Management, McCombs School of Business, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712)

  • Guoming Lai

    (Department of Information, Risk, and Operations Management, McCombs School of Business, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712)

Abstract

Problem definition : Although it is well known that a reseller’s ability to hold strategic inventory under a short-term supply contract can potentially benefit both the reseller and a supplier, existing research on strategic inventory focuses almost exclusively on exclusive reselling environments. However, in practice, multiple suppliers often sell to the same nonexclusive reseller, and it is not uncommon for suppliers to ask for future commitments to order quantities from resellers in return for their own commitment to wholesale prices. We investigate how the possibility of strategic inventory influences competing suppliers’ choices between short-term transactional and long-term commitment contracts to a nonexclusive reseller. Methodology/results : Using a game-theoretic model, we consider the interactions between two partially substitutable suppliers and a single, nonexclusive reseller over a two-period horizon in which demand is deterministic. We demonstrate that in nonexclusive reselling environments, where more than one supplier sells its product through the same reseller, the use of strategic inventory under short-term contracts intensifies the price competition between suppliers. We show how this effect can be mitigated when one or both suppliers offer a long-term contract. Moreover, we show that long-term contracts can arise as an equilibrium outcome, particularly when products are more substitutable or holding costs are large. Managerial implications : By considering the interactions between two partially substitutable suppliers and a nonexclusive reseller in a multiperiod setting, we contribute to the literature on strategic contracting and long versus short-term contracts. Our research provides managers with a new explanation, beyond the need to encourage idiosyncratic investments or eliminate the possibility of hold-up, for why long-term contracts may benefit suppliers in practice, who face competition while selling through a nonexclusive reseller.

Suggested Citation

  • Abhishek Roy & Stephen M. Gilbert & Guoming Lai, 2022. "The Implications of Strategic Inventory for Short-Term vs. Long-Term Supply Contracts in Nonexclusive Reselling Environments," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 24(5), pages 2629-2647, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:24:y:2022:i:5:p:2629-2647
    DOI: 10.1287/msom.2022.1114
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/msom.2022.1114
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/msom.2022.1114?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert Swinney & Serguei Netessine, 2009. "Long-Term Contracts Under the Threat of Supplier Default," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 11(1), pages 109-127, September.
    2. Tony Haitao Cui & Guangwen Kong & Behrooz Pourghannad, 2020. "Is Simplicity the Ultimate Sophistication? The Superiority of Linear Pricing," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(7), pages 1767-1788, July.
    3. Robin Hartwig & Karl Inderfurth & Abdolkarim Sadrieh & Guido Voigt, 2015. "Strategic Inventory and Supply Chain Behavior," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 24(8), pages 1329-1345, August.
    4. Williamson, Oliver E, 1979. "Transaction-Cost Economics: The Governance of Contractural Relations," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 22(2), pages 233-261, October.
    5. Yehuda Bassok & Ravi Anupindi, 2008. "Analysis of supply contracts with commitments and flexibility," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 55(5), pages 459-477, August.
    6. Huiqi Guan & Haresh Gurnani & Xin Geng & Yadong Luo, 2019. "Strategic Inventory and Supplier Encroachment," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 21(3), pages 536-555, July.
    7. Mantin, Benny & Jiang, Lifei, 2017. "Strategic inventories with quality deterioration," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(1), pages 155-164.
    8. Nirvikar Singh & Xavier Vives, 1984. "Price and Quantity Competition in a Differentiated Duopoly," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 15(4), pages 546-554, Winter.
    9. Gilbert, Stephen M. & Cvsa, Viswanath, 2003. "Strategic commitment to price to stimulate downstream innovation in a supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 150(3), pages 617-639, November.
    10. Cuihong Li & Laurens G. Debo, 2009. "Strategic dynamic sourcing from competing suppliers with transferable capacity investment," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 56(6), pages 540-562, September.
    11. Fudenberg, Drew & Holmstrom, Bengt & Milgrom, Paul, 1990. "Short-term contracts and long-term agency relationships," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 51(1), pages 1-31, June.
    12. Abhishek Roy & Stephen M. Gilbert & Guoming Lai, 2019. "The Implications of Visibility on the Use of Strategic Inventory in a Supply Chain," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(4), pages 1752-1767, April.
    13. A. A. Tsay & W. S. Lovejoy, 1999. "Quantity Flexibility Contracts and Supply Chain Performance," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 1(2), pages 89-111.
    14. Crawford, Vincent P, 1988. "Long-term Relationships Governed by Short-term Contracts," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 78(3), pages 485-499, June.
    15. Xu Chen & Xiaojun Wang & Yusen Xia, 2019. "Production Coopetition Strategies for Competing Manufacturers that Produce Partially Substitutable Products," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 28(6), pages 1446-1464, June.
    16. Zhan Qu & Horst Raff, 2021. "Vertical Contracts in a Supply Chain and the Bullwhip Effect," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(6), pages 3744-3756, June.
    17. Pınar Keskinocak & Kasarin Chivatxaranukul & Paul M. Griffin, 2008. "Strategic inventory in capacitated supply chain procurement," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(1), pages 23-36.
    18. Krishnan Anand & Ravi Anupindi & Yehuda Bassok, 2008. "Strategic Inventories in Vertical Contracts," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(10), pages 1792-1804, October.
    19. Andy A. Tsay, 1999. "The Quantity Flexibility Contract and Supplier-Customer Incentives," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(10), pages 1339-1358, October.
    20. Anil Arya & Brian Mittendorf & David E. M. Sappington, 2007. "The Bright Side of Supplier Encroachment," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(5), pages 651-659, 09-10.
    21. Cheung, Ki Ling & Yuan, Xue-Ming, 2003. "An infinite horizon inventory model with periodic order commitment," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 146(1), pages 52-66, April.
    22. Parshuram Hotkar & Stephen M. Gilbert, 2021. "Supplier Encroachment in a Nonexclusive Reselling Channel," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(9), pages 5821-5837, September.
    23. McAfee, R Preston & Schwartz, Marius, 1994. "Opportunism in Multilateral Vertical Contracting: Nondiscrimination, Exclusivity, and Uniformity," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 84(1), pages 210-230, March.
    24. Z. Justin Ren & Morris A. Cohen & Teck H. Ho & Christian Terwiesch, 2010. "Information Sharing in a Long-Term Supply Chain Relationship: The Role of Customer Review Strategy," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(1), pages 81-93, February.
    25. Weixin Shang & Albert Y. Ha & Shilu Tong, 2016. "Information Sharing in a Supply Chain with a Common Retailer," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(1), pages 245-263, January.
    26. Anil Arya & Brian Mittendorf, 2013. "Managing Strategic Inventories via Manufacturer-to-Consumer Rebates," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(4), pages 813-818, April.
    27. Mantin, Benny & Veldman, Jasper, 2019. "Managing strategic inventories under investment in process improvement," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 279(3), pages 782-794.
    28. Albert Y. Ha & Shilu Tong, 2008. "Contracting and Information Sharing Under Supply Chain Competition," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(4), pages 701-715, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wang, Zeming & Veldman, Jasper & Teunter, Ruud, 2026. "Strategic inventories under the reference price effect," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 330(3), pages 914-924.
    2. Ma, Chenglin & Pun, Hubert & Zhao, Ruiqing, 2026. "Strategic inventory of original products amid new product launches," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 329(3), pages 878-889.
    3. Ke, Wan & Zhou, Xiaoyang & Lev, Benjamin & Shen, Wenjing, 2025. "Strategic Inventory with an Unreliable Manufacturer across Multiple Supply Chain Structures," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yang, Xi & Dai, Bin & Xie, Xia, 2024. "Supplier encroachment strategies in a retail platform with strategic inventory holding behavior," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    2. Ma, Chenglin & Pun, Hubert & Zhao, Ruiqing, 2026. "Strategic inventory of original products amid new product launches," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 329(3), pages 878-889.
    3. Wang, Ningning & Xing, Wei & Zhao, Xuan, 2022. "Strategic inventory in the presence of socially responsible dual distribution channels," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    4. Xi Li & Yanzhi Li & Ying-Ju Chen, 2022. "Strategic Inventories Under Supply Chain Competition," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 24(1), pages 77-90, January.
    5. Lucy Gongtao Chen & Weijia Gu & Qinshen Tang, 2023. "Strategic Inventories in Competitive Supply Chains Under Bargaining," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 25(6), pages 2160-2175, November.
    6. Saha, Subrata & Mantin, Benny & Majumder, Sani & Nielsen, Izabela, 2024. "On the interdependence of strategic inventories and new product generation introduction," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    7. Lang Xiong & Tingting Xiao & Fuhai Nie, 2022. "Group Buying of Competing Retailers with Strategic Inventory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-18, October.
    8. Wang, Zeming & Veldman, Jasper & Teunter, Ruud, 2026. "Strategic inventories under the reference price effect," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 330(3), pages 914-924.
    9. QU, Zhan & RAFF, Horst, 2023. "Two-part tariffs, inventory stockpiling, and the bullwhip effect," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 308(1), pages 201-214.
    10. Miao, Jie & Liu, Aijun & Wang, Ruiyao & Lu, Hui, 2022. "The influence of information asymmetry on the strategic inventory of deteriorating commodity," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    11. Liu, Xuxu & Zhao, Da & Ji, Qingkai & Zeng, Yinlian & Hu, Xiangpei, 2023. "Managing strategic inventory under retailer competition," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 308(3), pages 1206-1219.
    12. Toshiki Matsuoka, 2023. "Input price discrimination and strategic inventory," Manchester School, University of Manchester, vol. 91(2), pages 118-138, March.
    13. Albert Y. Ha & Huajiang Luo & Weixin Shang, 2022. "Supplier Encroachment, Information Sharing, and Channel Structure in Online Retail Platforms," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(3), pages 1235-1251, March.
    14. Li, Jin & Chen, Yanan & Liao, Yi & Shi, Victor & Zhang, Haixia, 2025. "Managing strategic inventories in a three-echelon supply chain of durable goods," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    15. Abhishek Roy & Stephen M. Gilbert & Guoming Lai, 2019. "The Implications of Visibility on the Use of Strategic Inventory in a Supply Chain," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(4), pages 1752-1767, April.
    16. Zhang, Xuefeng & Zhang, Yutan & Li, Guo, 2024. "Strategic inventory in semi-conductor supply chains under industrial disruption," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    17. Li, Jin & Yi, Liao & Shi, Victor & Chen, Xiding, 2021. "Supplier encroachment strategy in the presence of retail strategic inventory: Centralization or decentralization?," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    18. Ke, Wan & Zhou, Xiaoyang & Lev, Benjamin & Shen, Wenjing, 2025. "Strategic Inventory with an Unreliable Manufacturer across Multiple Supply Chain Structures," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    19. Jiahua Zhang & Lian Qi & Shilu Tong, 2021. "Dynamic Contract under Quick Response in a Supply Chain with Information Asymmetry," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(5), pages 1273-1289, May.
    20. Mantin, Benny & Veldman, Jasper, 2019. "Managing strategic inventories under investment in process improvement," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 279(3), pages 782-794.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:24:y:2022:i:5:p:2629-2647. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.