IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormoor/v48y2023i3p1607-1629.html

Contextual Bandits with Cross-Learning

Author

Listed:
  • Santiago Balseiro

    (Columbia Business School, Columbia University, New York 10027)

  • Negin Golrezaei

    (Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139)

  • Mohammad Mahdian

    (Google Research, New York, New York 10011)

  • Vahab Mirrokni

    (Google Research, New York, New York 10011)

  • Jon Schneider

    (Google Research, New York, New York 10011)

Abstract

In the classic contextual bandits problem, in each round t , a learner observes some context c , chooses some action i to perform, and receives some reward r i , t ( c ) . We consider the variant of this problem in which in addition to receiving the reward r i , t ( c ) , the learner also learns the values of r i , t ( c ′ ) for some other contexts c ′ in set O i ( c ) , that is, the rewards that would be achieved by performing that action under different contexts c ′ ∈ O i ( c ) . This variant arises in several strategic settings, such as learning how to bid in nontruthful repeated auctions, which has gained a lot of attention lately as many platforms have switched to running first price auctions. We call this problem the contextual bandits problem with cross-learning. The best algorithms for the classic contextual bandits problem achieve O ˜ ( CKT ) regret against all stationary policies, in which C is the number of contexts, K the number of actions, and T the number of rounds. We design and analyze new algorithms for the contextual bandits problem with cross-learning and show that their regret has better dependence on the number of contexts. Under complete cross-learning in which the rewards for all contexts are learned when choosing an action, that is, set O i ( c ) contains all contexts, we show that our algorithms achieve regret O ˜ ( K T ) , removing the dependence on C . For any other cases, that is, under partial cross-learning in which | O i ( c ) | < C for some context–action pair of ( i , c ), the regret bounds depend on how the sets O i ( c ) impact the degree to which cross-learning between contexts is possible. We simulate our algorithms on real auction data from an ad exchange running first price auctions and show that they outperform traditional contextual bandit algorithms.

Suggested Citation

  • Santiago Balseiro & Negin Golrezaei & Mohammad Mahdian & Vahab Mirrokni & Jon Schneider, 2023. "Contextual Bandits with Cross-Learning," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 48(3), pages 1607-1629, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormoor:v:48:y:2023:i:3:p:1607-1629
    DOI: 10.1287/moor.2022.1313
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/moor.2022.1313
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/moor.2022.1313?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Victor F. Araman & René Caldentey, 2009. "Dynamic Pricing for Nonperishable Products with Demand Learning," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 57(5), pages 1169-1188, October.
    2. Vivek F. Farias & Benjamin Van Roy, 2010. "Dynamic Pricing with a Prior on Market Response," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(1), pages 16-29, February.
    3. William Vickrey, 1961. "Counterspeculation, Auctions, And Competitive Sealed Tenders," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 16(1), pages 8-37, March.
    4. Wang Chi Cheung & David Simchi-Levi & He Wang, 2017. "Technical Note—Dynamic Pricing and Demand Learning with Limited Price Experimentation," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(6), pages 1722-1731, December.
    5. Negin Golrezaei & Adel Javanmard & Vahab Mirrokni, 2021. "Dynamic Incentive-Aware Learning: Robust Pricing in Contextual Auctions," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 69(1), pages 297-314, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yanjun Han & Tsachy Weissman & Zhengyuan Zhou, 2025. "Optimal No-Regret Learning in Repeated First-Price Auctions," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 73(1), pages 209-238, January.
    2. Rigel Galgana & Negin Golrezaei, 2025. "Learning in Repeated Multiunit Pay-as-Bid Auctions," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 27(1), pages 200-229, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. N. Bora Keskin & Meng Li, 2024. "Selling Quality-Differentiated Products in a Markovian Market with Unknown Transition Probabilities," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 72(3), pages 885-902, May.
    2. Xiaocheng Li & Zeyu Zheng, 2024. "Dynamic Pricing with External Information and Inventory Constraint," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(9), pages 5985-6001, September.
    3. Xi Chen & Yining Wang, 2023. "Robust Dynamic Pricing with Demand Learning in the Presence of Outlier Customers," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 71(4), pages 1362-1386, July.
    4. John R. Birge & Hongfan (Kevin) Chen & N. Bora Keskin, 2025. "Markdown Policies for Demand Learning with Forward-Looking Customers," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 73(5), pages 2550-2566, September.
    5. Ghate, Archis, 2015. "Optimal minimum bids and inventory scrapping in sequential, single-unit, Vickrey auctions with demand learning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 245(2), pages 555-570.
    6. Amine Allouah & Omar Besbes, 2020. "Prior-Independent Optimal Auctions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(10), pages 4417-4432, October.
    7. Ningyuan Chen & Guillermo Gallego, 2021. "Nonparametric Pricing Analytics with Customer Covariates," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 69(3), pages 974-984, May.
    8. Gah-Yi Ban & N. Bora Keskin, 2021. "Personalized Dynamic Pricing with Machine Learning: High-Dimensional Features and Heterogeneous Elasticity," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(9), pages 5549-5568, September.
    9. Maxime C. Cohen & Sentao Miao & Yining Wang, 2025. "Dynamic Pricing with Fairness Constraints," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 73(6), pages 3027-3043, November.
    10. Xi Chen & David Simchi-Levi & Yining Wang, 2022. "Privacy-Preserving Dynamic Personalized Pricing with Demand Learning," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(7), pages 4878-4898, July.
    11. Ningyuan Chen & Guillermo Gallego, 2022. "A Primal–Dual Learning Algorithm for Personalized Dynamic Pricing with an Inventory Constraint," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 47(4), pages 2585-2613, November.
    12. Xi Chen & Sentao Miao & Yining Wang, 2023. "Differential Privacy in Personalized Pricing with Nonparametric Demand Models," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 71(2), pages 581-602, March.
    13. Sentao Miao & Xi Chen & Xiuli Chao & Jiaxi Liu & Yidong Zhang, 2022. "Context‐based dynamic pricing with online clustering," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(9), pages 3559-3575, September.
    14. Mengzhenyu Zhang & Hyun-Soo Ahn & Joline Uichanco, 2022. "Data-Driven Pricing for a New Product," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 70(2), pages 847-866, March.
    15. Negin Golrezaei & Adel Javanmard & Vahab Mirrokni, 2021. "Dynamic Incentive-Aware Learning: Robust Pricing in Contextual Auctions," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 69(1), pages 297-314, January.
    16. Yiwei Chen & Vivek F. Farias, 2013. "Simple Policies for Dynamic Pricing with Imperfect Forecasts," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(3), pages 612-624, June.
    17. Hao Zhang, 2022. "Dynamic Learning and Decision Making via Basis Weight Vectors," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 70(3), pages 1835-1853, May.
    18. Hamsa Bastani & David Simchi-Levi & Ruihao Zhu, 2022. "Meta Dynamic Pricing: Transfer Learning Across Experiments," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(3), pages 1865-1881, March.
    19. Jason Rhuggenaath & Alp Akcay & Yingqian Zhang & Uzay Kaymak, 2022. "Setting Reserve Prices in Second-Price Auctions with Unobserved Bids," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(6), pages 2950-2967, November.
    20. Qi (George) Chen & Stefanus Jasin & Izak Duenyas, 2021. "Technical Note—Joint Learning and Optimization of Multi-Product Pricing with Finite Resource Capacity and Unknown Demand Parameters," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 69(2), pages 560-573, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormoor:v:48:y:2023:i:3:p:1607-1629. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.