IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v32y1986i8p1040-1060.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Searching for Positive Returns at the Track: A Multinomial Logit Model for Handicapping Horse Races

Author

Listed:
  • Ruth N. Bolton

    (Department of Marketing & Economic Analysis, Faculty of Business, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2R6)

  • Randall G. Chapman

    (Department of Marketing & Economic Analysis, Faculty of Business, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2R6)

Abstract

This paper investigates fundamental investment strategies to detect and exploit the public's systematic errors in horse race wager markets. A handicapping model is developed and applied to win-betting in the pari-mutuel system. A multinomial logit model of the horse racing process is posited and estimated on a data base of 200 races. A recently developed procedure for exploiting the information content of rank ordered choice sets is employed to obtain more efficient parameter estimates. The variables in this discrete choice probability model include horse and jockey characteristics, plus several race-specific features. Hold-out sampling procedures are employed to evaluate wagering strategies. A wagering strategy that involves unobtrusive bets, with a side constraint eliminating long-shot betting, appears to offer the promise of positive expected returns, even in the presence of the typically large track take encountered at Thoroughbred racing events.

Suggested Citation

  • Ruth N. Bolton & Randall G. Chapman, 1986. "Searching for Positive Returns at the Track: A Multinomial Logit Model for Handicapping Horse Races," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(8), pages 1040-1060, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:32:y:1986:i:8:p:1040-1060
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.32.8.1040
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.8.1040
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.32.8.1040?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:32:y:1986:i:8:p:1040-1060. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.