IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormksc/v8y1989i4p371-374.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Note—Conjoint Reliability Measures

Author

Listed:
  • Dick R. Wittink

    (Cornell University)

  • David J. Reibstein

    (University of Pennsylvania)

  • William Boulding

    (Duke University)

  • John E. G. Bateson

    (London Business School)

  • John W. Walsh

    (Cornell University)

Abstract

Researchers have used a variety of measures for the assessment of conjoint analysis reliability. In this note we critically evaluate two different measures and identify potential shortcomings for each one. We identify the context for which a given measure is suitable, and recommend the use of multiple measures for other cases.

Suggested Citation

  • Dick R. Wittink & David J. Reibstein & William Boulding & John E. G. Bateson & John W. Walsh, 1989. "Note—Conjoint Reliability Measures," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 8(4), pages 371-374.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormksc:v:8:y:1989:i:4:p:371-374
    DOI: 10.1287/mksc.8.4.371
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mksc.8.4.371
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mksc.8.4.371?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alvarez-Farizo, Begona & Hanley, Nick, 2002. "Using conjoint analysis to quantify public preferences over the environmental impacts of wind farms. An example from Spain," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 107-116, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    conjoint analysis; reliability;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormksc:v:8:y:1989:i:4:p:371-374. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.