IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orited/v23y2023i2p95-103.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Are Students Learning in a Business Statistics Course? Evidence from Both Direct and Indirect Assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Sinjini Mitra

    (Department of Information Systems and Decision Sciences, California State University, Fullerton, California 92831)

Abstract

This paper studies how both direct and indirect assessment outcomes can determine how students are learning different concepts in business statistics. We explore connections between the outcomes from the two assessment approaches and how different student characteristics and background factors impact these two methods of assessment. The results based on a sample of 64 students enrolled in an undergraduate business statistics course at a large public university designated as a minority-serving institution show some similarities and some differences among the two types of assessment outcomes and the insights they provide about overall student learning in the course. Furthermore, factors like gender and background grade point average are seen to impact both direct and indirect assessment results, whereas others such as the type of business concentration and student status only impact one type of assessment. Finally, we show that some indirect assessment outcomes can predict direct assessment outcomes while controlling for demographic and other background variables.

Suggested Citation

  • Sinjini Mitra, 2023. "How Are Students Learning in a Business Statistics Course? Evidence from Both Direct and Indirect Assessment," INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 23(2), pages 95-103, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:orited:v:23:y:2023:i:2:p:95-103
    DOI: 10.1287/ited.2022.0270
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/ited.2022.0270
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/ited.2022.0270?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sinjini Mitra & Gerard Beenen, 2019. "A Comparative Study of Learning Styles and Motivational Factors in Traditional and Online Sections of a Business Course," INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 20(1), pages 1-15, September.
    2. Gloria Crisp & Erin Doran & Nicole A. Salis Reyes, 2018. "Predicting Graduation Rates at 4-year Broad Access Institutions Using a Bayesian Modeling Approach," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 59(2), pages 133-155, March.
    3. Sinjini Mitra & Zvi Goldstein, 2018. "Impact of Supplemental Instruction on Business Courses: A Statistical Study," INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 18(2), pages 89-101, January.
    4. Joan B. Garfield & Iddo Gal, 1999. "Assessment and Statistics Education: Current Challenges and Directions," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 67(1), pages 1-12, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stacey Vaziri & Baback Vaziri & Luis J. Novoa & Elham Torabi, 2022. "Academic Motivation in Introductory Business Analytics Courses: A Bayesian Approach," INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 22(2), pages 121-129, January.
    2. Jeongeun Kim & Molly Ott & Lindsey Dippold, 2020. "University and Department Influences on Scientists’ Occupational Outcomes," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 61(2), pages 197-228, March.
    3. Catherine Cleophas & Christoph Hönnige & Frank Meisel & Philipp Meyer, 2023. "Who’s Cheating? Mining Patterns of Collusion from Text and Events in Online Exams," INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 23(2), pages 84-94, January.
    4. Peter Petocz & Anna Reid, 2010. "On Becoming a Statistician—A Qualitative View," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 78(2), pages 271-286, August.
    5. Sinjini Mitra & Gerard Beenen, 2019. "A Comparative Study of Learning Styles and Motivational Factors in Traditional and Online Sections of a Business Course," INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 20(1), pages 1-15, September.
    6. Dina El Kayaly, 2013. "Towards more real-live teachings of business statistics: a Review of Challenges, Teaching Innovations and Strategies for Reform in Egypt," Working Papers 2013/21, Maastricht School of Management.
    7. Chris Wild, 2007. "Virtual Environments and the Acceleration of Experiential Learning," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 75(3), pages 322-335, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orited:v:23:y:2023:i:2:p:95-103. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.