IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orited/v17y2017i2p43-48.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Student Peer Evaluated Line Balancing Competition

Author

Listed:
  • Brent Snider

    (Operations and Supply Chain Management, Haskayne School of Business, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4, Canada)

  • Nancy Southin

    (Management Department, School of Business and Economics, Thompson Rivers University, Kamloops, British Columbia V2C OC8, Canada)

  • Sherry Weaver

    (Operations and Supply Chain Management, Haskayne School of Business, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4, Canada)

Abstract

The Student Peer Evaluated Line Balancing Competition is a 30-minute in-class problem-based learning experiential exercise that challenges student groups to design a feasible and efficient laptop computer assembly line. Each student group’s proposed design is publicly peer-reviewed by the rest of the class, enabling students to evaluate various alternatives and realize the key requirements for optimally balancing an assembly line. Evidence of effectiveness is provided, including student survey results and a statistical analysis of exam question performance both before and after the exercise was incorporated into our business undergraduate operations management class. The survey revealed that 96% of students recommended continued usage and 92% believed the competition helped them to be able to determine a feasible solution for line balancing problems. Exam question performance analysis revealed that our initial instructions for the competition actually resulted in lower performance compared to traditional lecture. We subsequently improved the instructions and found that this change has resulted in similar exam question performance as traditional lecture. The result is an exercise that significantly improves student engagement while maintaining student performance previously achieved through traditional lecture.

Suggested Citation

  • Brent Snider & Nancy Southin & Sherry Weaver, 2017. "Student Peer Evaluated Line Balancing Competition," INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 17(2), pages 43-48, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:orited:v:17:y:2017:i:2:p:43-48
    DOI: 10.1287/ited.2016.0164
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1287/ited.2016.0164
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/ited.2016.0164?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brent Snider & Jaydeep Balakrishnan, 2013. "Lessons Learned from Implementing Web-Based Simulations to Teach Operations Management Concepts," INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 13(3), pages 152-161, May.
    2. David J. Robb & M. Eric Johnson & Edward A. Silver, 2010. "An In-Class Competition Introducing Inventory Management Concepts," INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 10(3), pages 122-125, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Taher Ahmadi & Bo van der Rhee, 2023. "Multiobjective Line Balancing Game: Collaboration and Peer Evaluation," INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 23(3), pages 179-195, May.
    2. John F. Wellington & Stephen A. Lewis, 2018. "Interactive Excel-Based Procedure for Line Balancing," INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 19(1), pages 23-35, September.
    3. Daniel M. Frances & Daria Terekhov, 2019. "A Case-Based Undergraduate Operations Research Course," INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 19(2), pages 67-80, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rosanna Cole & Brent Snider, 2020. "Rolling the Dice on Global Supply Chain Sustainability: A Total Cost of Ownership Simulation," INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 20(3), pages 165-176, May.
    2. Maureen P. Lojo, 2016. "Improving Undergraduate Student Performance on the Littlefield Simulation," INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 16(2), pages 54-59, January.
    3. Qiang Liu & Xinhui Zhang & Yan Liu & Lebin Lin, 2013. "Spreadsheet Inventory Simulation and Optimization Models and Their Application in a National Pharmacy Chain," INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 14(1), pages 13-25, September.
    4. Taher Ahmadi & Bo van der Rhee, 2023. "Multiobjective Line Balancing Game: Collaboration and Peer Evaluation," INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 23(3), pages 179-195, May.
    5. Sarah G. Nurre & Jeffery D. Weir, 2017. "Interactive Excel-Based Gantt Chart Schedule Builder," INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 17(2), pages 49-57, January.
    6. Xiangling Hu & Ashok Kumar, 2013. "Case Article ---Beijing Opera Mask Sales in Four Cities in the United States," INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 13(3), pages 138-144, May.
    7. Christopher P. Wright, 2015. "Game—The Zu Zitter Game: A Course-Long Tool for Teaching Operations Management," INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 15(3), pages 240-253, May.
    8. James J. Cochran, 2015. "Extending “Lego ® My Simplex”," INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 15(3), pages 224-231, May.
    9. Anita L Tucker & Cindy Lefton, 2015. "Game—The Dressing Change Game," INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 15(2), pages 188-196, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orited:v:17:y:2017:i:2:p:43-48. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.