IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orisre/v8y1997i2p203-211.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research Report: The Effectiveness of Multiple Dialogues in Electronic Brainstorming

Author

Listed:
  • Alan R. Dennis

    (Department of Management, Terry College of Business, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602)

  • Joseph S. Valacich

    (Department of Management and Systems, College of Business and Economics, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington 99164)

  • Traci A. Carte

    (Department of Management, Terry College of Business, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602)

  • Monica J. Garfield

    (Department of Management, Terry College of Business, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602)

  • Barbara J. Haley

    (Department of Management, Terry College of Business, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602)

  • Jay E. Aronson

    (Department of Management, Terry College of Business, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602)

Abstract

Members of brainstorming groups often pursue the same set of ideas rather than considering a wide and diverse range of ideas, which may reduce the number of ideas they produce. One way to reduce this cognitive inertia may be to encourage groups to engage in several simultaneous discussions or dialogues. This experiment, which studied groups brainstorming electronically, found that groups generated more ideas, more high-quality ideas, and more novel ideas when using multiple dialogues than when using single dialogues.

Suggested Citation

  • Alan R. Dennis & Joseph S. Valacich & Traci A. Carte & Monica J. Garfield & Barbara J. Haley & Jay E. Aronson, 1997. "Research Report: The Effectiveness of Multiple Dialogues in Electronic Brainstorming," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 8(2), pages 203-211, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:orisre:v:8:y:1997:i:2:p:203-211
    DOI: 10.1287/isre.8.2.203
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/isre.8.2.203
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/isre.8.2.203?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. William B. Martz & Morgan M. Shepherd, 2004. "Group Consensus: The Impact of Multiple Dialogues," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 13(4), pages 315-325, July.
    2. Deepa K. Ray & Nicholas C. Romano, 2013. "Creative Problem Solving in GSS Groups: Do Creative Styles Matter?," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 22(6), pages 1129-1157, November.
    3. repec:gdk:wpaper:42 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Bruce A. Reinig & Robert O. Briggs, 2008. "On The Relationship Between Idea-Quantity and Idea-Quality During Ideation," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 17(5), pages 403-420, September.
    5. Traci A. Carte & Laku Chidambaram & Aaron Becker, 2006. "Emergent Leadership in Self-Managed Virtual Teams," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 323-343, July.
    6. D Shaw, 2003. "Evaluating electronic workshops through analysing the ‘brainstormed’ ideas," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 54(7), pages 692-705, July.
    7. Rita M. Walczuch & Richard T. Watson, 2001. "Analyzing Group Data in MIS Research: Including the Effect of the Group," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 83-94, January.
    8. Bruce A. Reinig & Robert O. Briggs, 2013. "Putting Quality First in Ideation Research," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 22(5), pages 943-973, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orisre:v:8:y:1997:i:2:p:203-211. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.