IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orinte/v42y2012i2p180-190.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimizing the Sunday Singles Lineup for a Ryder Cup Captain

Author

Listed:
  • Brian McClure

    (University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas 72701)

  • Richard Cassady

    (University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas 72701)

  • Chase Rainwater

    (University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas 72701)

  • Justin R. Chimka

    (University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas 72701)

Abstract

The Ryder Cup competition between Team USA and Team Europe is the premier team event in professional golf, largely because of the drama associated with head-to-head matches on the final day (Sunday). The captain of each team must determine the exact sequence of his 12 golfers in the 12 Sunday singles matches, and neither captain is precisely aware of the other captain's intended lineup. Because the losing captain has often been criticized for choosing what the critics deem to be a poor lineup, we develop a quantitative methodology that a captain can use to determine his Sunday singles lineup to maximize the probability that his team is in possession of the Ryder Cup upon completion of the competition. As part of our effort, we develop a statistical model for estimating the three possible outcomes (win, lose, tie) of each singles match. Using the 1989–2008 Ryder Cup competitions as examples, we find that using our statistical model within our methodology indicates that the Sunday singles competition is not greatly impacted by the lineup selected by the captain. However, we define another example that indicates our methodology can be of great benefit if a player's performance is affected by who his singles match opponent is.

Suggested Citation

  • Brian McClure & Richard Cassady & Chase Rainwater & Justin R. Chimka, 2012. "Optimizing the Sunday Singles Lineup for a Ryder Cup Captain," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 42(2), pages 180-190, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:42:y:2012:i:2:p:180-190
    DOI: 10.1287/inte.1110.0579
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/inte.1110.0579
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/inte.1110.0579?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. W. J. Hurley, 2002. "How Should Team Captains Order Golfers on the Final Day of the Ryder Cup Matches?," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 32(2), pages 74-77, April.
    2. C. Richard Cassady & Lisa M. Maillart & Sinan Salman, 2005. "Ranking Sports Teams: A Customizable Quadratic Assignment Approach," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 35(6), pages 497-510, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Michael J. Fry & Jeffrey W. Ohlmann, 2012. "Introduction to the Special Issue on Analytics in Sports, Part I: General Sports Applications," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 42(2), pages 105-108, April.
    2. Oberhelman Dennis & Galbreth Michael & Fry Timothy, 2013. "Equitable handicapping of scramble golf tournaments," Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, De Gruyter, vol. 9(4), pages 285-300, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Oberhelman Dennis & Galbreth Michael & Fry Timothy, 2013. "Equitable handicapping of scramble golf tournaments," Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, De Gruyter, vol. 9(4), pages 285-300, December.
    2. William J. Hurley, 2007. "The 2002 Ryder Cup: Was Strange’s Decision to Put Tiger Woods in the Anchor Match a Good One?," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 4(1), pages 41-45, March.
    3. Tino Werner, 2022. "Elicitability of Instance and Object Ranking," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 19(2), pages 123-140, June.
    4. Michael J. Fry & Jeffrey W. Ohlmann, 2012. "Introduction to the Special Issue on Analytics in Sports, Part I: General Sports Applications," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 42(2), pages 105-108, April.
    5. Ball Michael O & Halper Russell, 2009. "Scramble Teams for the Pinehurst Terrapin Classic," Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, De Gruyter, vol. 5(2), pages 1-25, May.
    6. G Kendall, 2008. "Scheduling English football fixtures over holiday periods," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 59(6), pages 743-755, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:42:y:2012:i:2:p:180-190. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.