IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orijoc/v34y2022i2p1224-1239.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Managing Advance Admission Requests for Obstetric Care

Author

Listed:
  • Na Geng

    (Sino-US Global Logistics Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 200030 Shanghai, China)

  • Xiaolan Xie

    (Center for Biomedical & Healthcare Engineering, Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Saint-Etienne, 42023 Saint-Etienne, France; Antai College of Economics and Management, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 200030 Shanghai, China)

Abstract

This paper is devoted to the management of advance admission requests for obstetric care. Pregnant women in China select one hospital and request admission for both antenatal and postnatal care after nine weeks of pregnancy. Schedulers must make the admission decision instantly based on the availability of the most critical resource, that is, hospital beds for postnatal care. The random delay between admission requests and postnatal care has created a distinct advance admission control problem. To address this issue, we propose a basic model that assumes a unit bed requirement for one day. Each admission generates a unit of revenue and each unit of overcapacity use incurs an overcapacity cost. With the objective of maximizing the expected net revenue, we establish an optimal policy for unlimited requests, that is, an expected arrival time quota (EATQ) policy that accepts a fixed quota of advance admission requests with the same expected date of confinement. We then propose an extended model for general capacity requirements. Using the Poisson approximation, we establish the optimality of the EATQ policy, which is shown to be solvable by a simple linear programming model. We compare the numerical results from the different policies and conduct a sensitivity analysis. The EATQ policy is demonstrated to be the best option in all test instances and notably outperforms the current admission rules used in hospitals, which usually accept admission requests according to some empirical monthly quota of the expected delivery month. The Poisson approximation is shown to be effective for determining the optimal EATQ policy for both stationary and nonstationary arrivals. Summary of Contribution: First, this paper investigates the advance admission control problem for obstetric care. Pregnant women in China choose one hospital and request admission for both antenatal and postnatal care after nine weeks of pregnancy but the most critical resource is hospitalization beds needed for postnatal care. The random delay between admission request and postnatal care makes the problem unique and challenging to solve. It belongs to the scope of computing and operations research. Second, this paper formulates a dynamic programming model, analyzes the structural properties of the optimal control policy, and finally proposes a mathematical programming model to determine the optimal quota. Numerical experiments show the validity of the proposed approach. It covers the research contents of theories on dynamic stochastic control, mathematic programming model, and experiments. Moreover, this paper is motivated by the practical problem (advance admission control) in obstetric units of Shanghai. Using these optimality properties, solution approaches, and numerical results, this paper provides guidance on how to manage advance obstetric admission requests.

Suggested Citation

  • Na Geng & Xiaolan Xie, 2022. "Managing Advance Admission Requests for Obstetric Care," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(2), pages 1224-1239, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:orijoc:v:34:y:2022:i:2:p:1224-1239
    DOI: 10.1287/ijoc.2021.1093
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.2021.1093
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/ijoc.2021.1093?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jonathan E. Helm & Mark P. Van Oyen, 2014. "Design and Optimization Methods for Elective Hospital Admissions," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 62(6), pages 1265-1282, December.
    2. Christiane Barz & Kumar Rajaram, 2015. "Elective Patient Admission and Scheduling under Multiple Resource Constraints," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 24(12), pages 1907-1930, December.
    3. Jonathan Patrick & Martin L. Puterman & Maurice Queyranne, 2008. "Dynamic Multipriority Patient Scheduling for a Diagnostic Resource," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 56(6), pages 1507-1525, December.
    4. Dongyang Wang & Kumar Muthuraman & Douglas Morrice, 2019. "Coordinated Patient Appointment Scheduling for a Multistation Healthcare Network," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(3), pages 599-618, May.
    5. Peter Kolesar, 1970. "A Markovian Model for Hospital Admission Scheduling," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(6), pages 384-396, February.
    6. Kim, Seung-Chul & Horowitz, Ira, 2002. "Scheduling hospital services: the efficacy of elective-surgery quotas," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 30(5), pages 335-346, October.
    7. Fanwen Meng & Jin Qi & Meilin Zhang & James Ang & Singfat Chu & Melvyn Sim, 2015. "A Robust Optimization Model for Managing Elective Admission in a Public Hospital," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 63(6), pages 1452-1467, December.
    8. Muer Yang & Michael J. Fry & Corey Scurlock, 2015. "The ICU will see you now: efficient–equitable admission control policies for a surgical ICU with batch arrivals," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(6), pages 586-599, June.
    9. René Bekker & Paulien Koeleman, 2011. "Scheduling admissions and reducing variability in bed demand," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 237-249, September.
    10. Sauré, Antoine & Patrick, Jonathan & Tyldesley, Scott & Puterman, Martin L., 2012. "Dynamic multi-appointment patient scheduling for radiation therapy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 223(2), pages 573-584.
    11. Jivan Deglise‐Hawkinson & Jonathan E. Helm & Todd Huschka & David L. Kaufman & Mark P. Van Oyen, 2018. "A Capacity Allocation Planning Model for Integrated Care and Access Management," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 27(12), pages 2270-2290, December.
    12. Yasin Gocgun & Martin Puterman, 2014. "Dynamic scheduling with due dates and time windows: an application to chemotherapy patient appointment booking," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 60-76, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Seokjun Youn & H. Neil Geismar & Michael Pinedo, 2022. "Planning and scheduling in healthcare for better care coordination: Current understanding, trending topics, and future opportunities," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(12), pages 4407-4423, December.
    2. Minglong Zhou & Melvyn Sim & Shao‐Wei Lam, 2022. "Advance admission scheduling via resource satisficing," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(11), pages 4002-4020, November.
    3. Adam Diamant, 2021. "Dynamic multistage scheduling for patient-centered care plans," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 827-844, December.
    4. Dai, Jiajun & Geng, Na & Xie, Xiaolan, 2021. "Dynamic advance scheduling of outpatient appointments in a moving booking window," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 292(2), pages 622-632.
    5. Gang Du & Xinyue Li & Hui Hu & Xiaoling Ouyang, 2018. "Optimizing Daily Service Scheduling for Medical Diagnostic Equipment Considering Patient Satisfaction and Hospital Revenue," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-23, September.
    6. Jie Bai & Andreas Fügener & Jochen Gönsch & Jens O. Brunner & Manfred Blobner, 2021. "Managing admission and discharge processes in intensive care units," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 666-685, December.
    7. Esmaeil Keyvanshokooh & Pooyan Kazemian & Mohammad Fattahi & Mark P. Van Oyen, 2022. "Coordinated and Priority‐Based Surgical Care: An Integrated Distributionally Robust Stochastic Optimization Approach," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(4), pages 1510-1535, April.
    8. Silva, Thiago A.O. & de Souza, Mauricio C., 2020. "Surgical scheduling under uncertainty by approximate dynamic programming," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    9. Hessam Bavafa & Charles M. Leys & Lerzan Örmeci & Sergei Savin, 2019. "Managing Portfolio of Elective Surgical Procedures: A Multidimensional Inverse Newsvendor Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(6), pages 1543-1563, November.
    10. Yasin Gocgun, 2018. "Simulation-based approximate policy iteration for dynamic patient scheduling for radiation therapy," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 317-325, September.
    11. Ahmadi-Javid, Amir & Jalali, Zahra & Klassen, Kenneth J, 2017. "Outpatient appointment systems in healthcare: A review of optimization studies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(1), pages 3-34.
    12. Antoine Sauré & Jonathan Patrick & Martin L. Puterman, 2015. "Simulation-Based Approximate Policy Iteration with Generalized Logistic Functions," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 27(3), pages 579-595, August.
    13. Liping Zhou & Na Geng & Zhibin Jiang & Shan Jiang, 2022. "Integrated Multiresource Capacity Planning and Multitype Patient Scheduling," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(1), pages 129-149, January.
    14. Saied Samiedaluie & Beste Kucukyazici & Vedat Verter & Dan Zhang, 2017. "Managing Patient Admissions in a Neurology Ward," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(3), pages 635-656, June.
    15. Tugba Cayirli & Pinar Dursun & Evrim D. Gunes, 2019. "An integrated analysis of capacity allocation and patient scheduling in presence of seasonal walk-ins," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 31(2), pages 524-561, June.
    16. repec:ipg:wpaper:2013-014 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Jaime González & Juan-Carlos Ferrer & Alejandro Cataldo & Luis Rojas, 2019. "A proactive transfer policy for critical patient flow management," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 287-303, June.
    18. Camila Ramos & Alejandro Cataldo & Juan–Carlos Ferrer, 2020. "Appointment and patient scheduling in chemotherapy: a case study in Chilean hospitals," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 286(1), pages 411-439, March.
    19. Miao Bai & Bjorn Berg & Esra Sisikoglu Sir & Mustafa Y. Sir, 2023. "Partially partitioned templating strategies for outpatient specialty practices," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(1), pages 301-318, January.
    20. Jie Bai & Andreas Fügener & Jan Schoenfelder & Jens O. Brunner, 2018. "Operations research in intensive care unit management: a literature review," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 1-24, March.
    21. Yasin Gocgun & Martin Puterman, 2014. "Dynamic scheduling with due dates and time windows: an application to chemotherapy patient appointment booking," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 60-76, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orijoc:v:34:y:2022:i:2:p:1224-1239. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.