IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jdwm00/v2y2006i3p16-26.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A TOPSIS Data Mining Demonstration and Application to Credit Scoring

Author

Listed:
  • Desheng Wu

    (University of Toronto, Canada)

  • David L. Olson

    (University of Nebraska, USA)

Abstract

The technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) is a technique that can consider any number of measures, seeking to identify solutions close to an ideal and far from a nadir solution. TOPSIS has traditionally been applied in multiple criteria decision analysis. In this paper we propose an approach to develop a TOPSIS classifier. We demonstrate its use in credit scoring, providing a way to deal with large sets of data using machine learning. Data sets often contain many potential explanatory variables, some preferably minimized, some preferably maximized. Results are favorable by a comparison with traditional data mining techniques of decision trees. Proposed models are validated using Mont Carlo simulation.

Suggested Citation

  • Desheng Wu & David L. Olson, 2006. "A TOPSIS Data Mining Demonstration and Application to Credit Scoring," International Journal of Data Warehousing and Mining (IJDWM), IGI Global, vol. 2(3), pages 16-26, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:jdwm00:v:2:y:2006:i:3:p:16-26
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/jdwm.2006070102
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ouenniche, Jamal & Pérez-Gladish, Blanca & Bouslah, Kais, 2018. "An out-of-sample framework for TOPSIS-based classifiers with application in bankruptcy prediction," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 111-116.
    2. Başak Bulut Karageyik & Şule Şahin, 2017. "Determination of the Optimal Retention Level Based on Different Measures," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-21, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jdwm00:v:2:y:2006:i:3:p:16-26. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.