IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ifs/fistud/v20y1999i3p321-349.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The readability of Australia’s taxation laws and supplemetary materials: an empirical investigation

Author

Listed:
  • David Smith
  • Graham Richardson

Abstract

Australian taxation law has been criticised for many years for its difficulty to read and understand. The Tax Law Improvement Project (TLIP) was established in December 1993 to rewrite in plain language Australia’s income tax legislation. The primary purpose of this study is to test empirically the effectiveness of attempts at simplifying the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 as amended. The study utilises empirical measures in analysing the level of readability of Australia’s taxation laws. In doing so, it builds on earlier research, which applied similar methods in examining the New Zealand taxation simplification process. It was found that the sections of Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 sampled were slightly more readable than corresponding sections of Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 as amended, which is consistent with Wallschutzky’s (1995) findings. Nevertheless, the results fall well short of acceptable bench-marks, suggesting that the goal of simplification has not been achieved.

Suggested Citation

  • David Smith & Graham Richardson, 1999. "The readability of Australia’s taxation laws and supplemetary materials: an empirical investigation," Fiscal Studies, Institute for Fiscal Studies, vol. 20(3), pages 321-349, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:ifs:fistud:v:20:y:1999:i:3:p:321-349
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ifs.org.uk/fs/articles/0011a.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tanzi, Vito, 2000. "The role of the State and the quality of the public sector," Revista CEPAL, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), August.
    2. Aishah Sheikh Abu Bakar & Rashid Ameer, 2011. "Readability of Corporate Social Responsibility communication in Malaysia," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(1), pages 50-60, January.
    3. Hoppe, Thomas, 2020. "Tax complexity in Australia: A survey-based comparison to the OECD average," arqus Discussion Papers in Quantitative Tax Research 251, arqus - Arbeitskreis Quantitative Steuerlehre.
    4. Hoppe, Thomas & Schanz, Deborah & Sturm, Susann & Sureth-Sloane, Caren, 2017. "What are the drivers of tax complexity for multinational corporations? Evidence from 108 countries," arqus Discussion Papers in Quantitative Tax Research 223, arqus - Arbeitskreis Quantitative Steuerlehre.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • K34 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - Tax Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ifs:fistud:v:20:y:1999:i:3:p:321-349. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emma Hyman (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifsssuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.