IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/injmfa/v14y2022i4p362-377.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Employee ownership, corporate social responsibility and financial performance: evidence from the UK

Author

Listed:
  • Assem Orazayeva
  • Muhammad Arslan

Abstract

This study examines the impact of employee ownership on corporate social responsibility (CSR) and financial performance of 72 publicly listed UK firms for the period from 2011 to 2020. The objective of this study is to evaluate the magnitude and significance of the relationship. Prior literature presents limited evidence of the effects of employee ownership on social and financial aspects of firm performance, with focus on other ownership types. However, recent turbulent years caused by the global pandemic put employees as a stakeholder group under the spotlight, not only showing their importance but also vulnerability, thereby motivating this study to address employee-related issue. Contrary to the initial predictions of this study, we found small negative statistically significant coefficient between employee ownership and CSR. The link between CSR and financial performance was also observed to be negative, though the result lacks statistical significance. The study makes both theoretical and practical contributions by expanding current literature on employee ownership effects, as well as adding evidence for practitioners who consider changes in the ownership structure.

Suggested Citation

  • Assem Orazayeva & Muhammad Arslan, 2022. "Employee ownership, corporate social responsibility and financial performance: evidence from the UK," International Journal of Managerial and Financial Accounting, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 14(4), pages 362-377.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:injmfa:v:14:y:2022:i:4:p:362-377
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=126551
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:injmfa:v:14:y:2022:i:4:p:362-377. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=252 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.