IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijplur/v9y2018i1-2p106-127.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Teaching to think: challenges and suitability of teaching inequality topics in a business school

Author

Listed:
  • Danielle Guizzo
  • Lotta Takala-Greenish

Abstract

By employing a critical pedagogical approach that discusses non-dominant forms of knowledge, we demonstrate how two inequality topics - gender and trade - provide a platform for rethinking standard forms of economic and social knowledge. A detailed analysis of two modules, Political Economy and International Trade and Multinational Business, reveals an openness and interest in real world examples and active learning methods. Through these, student responses indicate an emerging acceptance and positive response to topics of inequality as the basis for critical thinking. Nevertheless, students also indicate frustration with the difficulty in matching the real world to current theoretical frameworks, and the suggested uncertainty of critical pedagogical approaches. The findings also suggest that improved knowledge of different empirical approaches may be useful to focus student interest and address areas of frustration during the learning process.

Suggested Citation

  • Danielle Guizzo & Lotta Takala-Greenish, 2018. "Teaching to think: challenges and suitability of teaching inequality topics in a business school," International Journal of Pluralism and Economics Education, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 9(1/2), pages 106-127.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijplur:v:9:y:2018:i:1/2:p:106-127
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=92238
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijplur:v:9:y:2018:i:1/2:p:106-127. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=319 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.