IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijplur/v7y2016i3p218-253.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Benchmarking objectives of Shari'ah (Islamic law): index and its performance in select OIC countries

Author

Listed:
  • Alaa Alaabed
  • Hossein Askari
  • Zamir Iqbal
  • Adam Ng

Abstract

Islam offers a sustainable and comprehensive development model for humanity that can be systematically categorised as the means as well as the ideal outcome of achieving Maqasid (objectives) of Shari'ah (Islamic law). As a rule-based religion, Islam's prescription for development goes well beyond market regulations and includes rules necessary to maintain a dignified life; in order that the faithful can maximise their intellectual capacity, preserve and promote their health and education, and have equal opportunity for employment and partnership in the economic and social development of society, and unhampered by practices of fraud, cheating, corruption, or property abuse, among others. In practice, however, there is dichotomy between Islam's prescription and the current state of affairs in Muslim countries. In order to develop a better understanding of the factors contributing to this divergence, this paper provides the design of a benchmark for the monitoring of adherence to and compliance with Maqasid al-Shari'ah. This benchmark is intended to serve as a self-inspection tool for policy makers to monitor economic, social and policy development within the scope of Maqasid, and to serve as a benchmark for the progress and performance of OIC member countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Alaa Alaabed & Hossein Askari & Zamir Iqbal & Adam Ng, 2016. "Benchmarking objectives of Shari'ah (Islamic law): index and its performance in select OIC countries," International Journal of Pluralism and Economics Education, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(3), pages 218-253.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijplur:v:7:y:2016:i:3:p:218-253
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=79685
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijplur:v:7:y:2016:i:3:p:218-253. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=319 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.