IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Finland and Sweden: a Nordic response to the Chicago School

Listed author(s):
  • Alan Duhs

Chicago School economics emphatically endorses individualism, antipathy to government intervention, and a minimalist approach to the welfare state. It features continuing calls for lower taxes and unrestricted markets. Nordic countries, on the other hand, have followed a different path towards socio-economic prosperity, favouring large welfare states, high taxes and high levels of government expenditure as a proportion of GDP. The Nordic countries have stressed reducing inequality and preserving social security. Despite these departures from free-market teachings, a scrutiny of a wide range of socio-economic indicators reveals that the Nordic countries tend to outperform other countries - including the USA and Australia - on many of these indicators, including perceived happiness levels. This paper thus addresses the universalist claims of Chicago School economics, and proceeds backwards from an examination of some empirical results to some evident implications for the (pluralist) teaching of economics.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Article provided by Inderscience Enterprises Ltd in its journal Int. J. of Pluralism and Economics Education.

Volume (Year): 6 (2015)
Issue (Month): 2 ()
Pages: 165-180

in new window

Handle: RePEc:ids:ijplur:v:6:y:2015:i:2:p:165-180
Contact details of provider: Web page:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijplur:v:6:y:2015:i:2:p:165-180. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Darren Simpson)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.