IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijmcdm/v4y2014i1p1-30.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An adaptive questioning procedure for eliciting PROMETHEE II's weight parameters

Author

Listed:
  • Stefan Eppe
  • Yves De Smet

Abstract

For most decision making problems, finding representative parameters of a decision maker's preferences remains a challenging task. We adapt to the PROMETHEE II outranking method an eliciting procedure named Q-Eval that has been developed in the context of multi-attribute utility theory (MAUT). It refines the estimation of the preference parameters by iteratively querying the DM through pairwise action comparisons. After formalising an extension of this method to two other types of queries: 1) selection of one action from a subset; 2) ranking of a subset of actions, we propose an adaptive query selection scheme that presents to the DM the most discriminating query type at each step of the process. Simulation results show that this approach improves the efficiency of the eliciting phase in terms of convergence speed.

Suggested Citation

  • Stefan Eppe & Yves De Smet, 2014. "An adaptive questioning procedure for eliciting PROMETHEE II's weight parameters," International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 4(1), pages 1-30.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijmcdm:v:4:y:2014:i:1:p:1-30
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=59961
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Doan, N.A.V. & De Smet, Y., 2018. "An alternative weight sensitivity analysis for PROMETHEE II rankings," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 166-174.
    2. de Almeida Filho, Adiel T. & Clemente, Thárcylla R.N. & Morais, Danielle Costa & de Almeida, Adiel Teixeira, 2018. "Preference modeling experiments with surrogate weighting procedures for the PROMETHEE method," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(2), pages 453-461.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijmcdm:v:4:y:2014:i:1:p:1-30. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=350 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.