IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijeded/v8y2017i2-3p101-115.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Migration as livelihood strategy - South Africa's East to West Corridor: altruism gone wrong

Author

Listed:
  • Palesa Makhetha-Kosi
  • Syden Mishi
  • Asrat Tsegaye
  • Sibanisezwe Khumalo

Abstract

Migration has long been considered a livelihood strategy in developing and middle-income countries, mainly because labour is one of the unique assets that most poor families find themselves in possession of. As a result, the migration tendencies are argued to be based on altruism- one family member self-sacrificing for the benefit of the household as a whole. This paper provides a deep analysis of this livelihood strategy through statistical analysis based on household survey data and qualitative analysis of the interviews with key informants. The study focused on households residing in Joe Gqabi district Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. The choice of the sample area is because it has the highest number of members living outside each household. The findings indicate that there is a great need and desire for household members to migrate given the socio-economic profile of the households and the lack of access or constraints to basic key assets. Furthermore, the results reveal that migration is failing as a livelihood strategy, becoming a rather increasing burden to remaining household members. The study findings have both policy and academic research implications.

Suggested Citation

  • Palesa Makhetha-Kosi & Syden Mishi & Asrat Tsegaye & Sibanisezwe Khumalo, 2017. "Migration as livelihood strategy - South Africa's East to West Corridor: altruism gone wrong," International Journal of Education Economics and Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 8(2/3), pages 101-115.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijeded:v:8:y:2017:i:2/3:p:101-115
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=86503
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijeded:v:8:y:2017:i:2/3:p:101-115. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=346 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.