IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijeded/v7y2016i1-2p33-52.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of different types of quizzes on student effort investment behaviour and learning outcomes

Author

Listed:
  • Tin-chun Lin

Abstract

We developed empirical models to test hypotheses that quizzes (announced or unannounced) can improve students' learning outcomes and enhance their investment in effort. The empirical analysis indicated support for the hypotheses. We further tested the hypothesis that these two different types of quizzes exert different influences on students' behaviour in effort investment and their learning outcomes. Consequently, evidence from an alternative demonstration indicated that these two types of quizzes could provide different impacts on students' effort investment and learning outcomes. Moreover, additional findings showed that quizzes not only provide a shorter-term learning goal - exam success - but also offer benefits for a longer-term learning goal - retaining information longer.

Suggested Citation

  • Tin-chun Lin, 2016. "Effects of different types of quizzes on student effort investment behaviour and learning outcomes," International Journal of Education Economics and Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(1/2), pages 33-52.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijeded:v:7:y:2016:i:1/2:p:33-52
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=79238
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijeded:v:7:y:2016:i:1/2:p:33-52. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=346 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.