IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Longitudinal analysis of voluntary adoption of XBRL on financial reporting

Listed author(s):
  • Jap Efendi
  • L. Murphy Smith
  • Jeffrey Wong
Registered author(s):

    In December 2008, the SEC approved final rules which require companies to submit financial statements in XBRL format with their SEC filings, beginning with quarterly June 2009 filings for the largest companies and within three years for all public companies. Previously, the SEC established a voluntary filing programme for XBRL reporting in March 2005. Accordingly, the objectives of our study are: 1) to provide an overview of the benefits and global development of XBRL; 2) to evaluate the extent of XBRL adoption following the implementation of the voluntary filing programme. We find the quantity of voluntary reporting to be relatively low, but reporting significantly increased over time. Voluntary adopters are larger and more innovative firms in their industries. We find that the time lags between filing reports in XBRL format and the ending of the fiscal year and quarter decreased over the time period of our study. This evidence suggests that there is a learning curve with XBRL reporting that voluntary adopters experience. Possible learning gains in the reporting process may translate ultimately into marginal cost savings for companies and more timely information for investors. This evidence may be consistent with XBRL being purported to have a positive effect on accounting and financial reporting worldwide, particularly used in conjunction with international financial reporting standards (IFRS).

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by Inderscience Enterprises Ltd in its journal Int. J. of Economics and Accounting.

    Volume (Year): 2 (2011)
    Issue (Month): 2 ()
    Pages: 173-189

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:ids:ijecac:v:2:y:2011:i:2:p:173-189
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijecac:v:2:y:2011:i:2:p:173-189. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Darren Simpson)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.