IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/nctjnl/v3y2017i1p26.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of De-Noising Algorithms Technique

Author

Listed:
  • Ogunsanwo Gbenga Oyewole
  • Goga Nicholas
  • Awodele Oludele
  • Okolie Samuel

Abstract

The concept of noise appears during the process of gathering the image into digital form- that is when the image is being created and it may also be introduced when the image is being transmitted. The presence of the noise usually degraded the quality of the image. De noising algorithms were employed in order to advance the value of the image. This paper tries to compare linear and non linear filtering algorithm. This study adopted image processing techniques to process 600 images dataset acquired from 60 different signers using vision based method. The acquired images were de-noised using Gaussian filter and Median filter algorithms. The outcomes of the two de-noising algorithms were compared using Peak Signal to Noise Ratio (PSNR) and Mean Square Error (MSE). The results of processed images for de-noising algorithms show that Median filter had higher PSNR of 47.7 than the Gaussian filter of 31.79, and lower MSE of 1.11 than Gaussian filter of 43.4.It was also ascertained that de-noised images with non-linear median filter had better quality than images de-noised by linear Gaussian filter.

Suggested Citation

  • Ogunsanwo Gbenga Oyewole & Goga Nicholas & Awodele Oludele & Okolie Samuel, 2017. "Comparison of De-Noising Algorithms Technique," Network and Communication Technologies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 3(1), pages 1-26, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:nctjnl:v:3:y:2017:i:1:p:26
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/nct/article/download/75908/42000
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/nct/article/view/75908
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:nctjnl:v:3:y:2017:i:1:p:26. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.